Tests: make prioritise_transaction.py more robust

pull/262/head
Suhas Daftuar 9 years ago committed by Suhas Daftuar
parent 3d0dfdbf9f
commit ec143391ef

@ -9,8 +9,7 @@
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import * from test_framework.util import *
from test_framework.mininode import COIN from test_framework.mininode import COIN, MAX_BLOCK_SIZE
class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework): class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
@ -29,14 +28,29 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.relayfee = self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['relayfee'] self.relayfee = self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['relayfee']
def run_test(self): def run_test(self):
utxos = create_confirmed_utxos(self.relayfee, self.nodes[0], 90) utxo_count = 90
utxos = create_confirmed_utxos(self.relayfee, self.nodes[0], utxo_count)
base_fee = self.relayfee*100 # our transactions are smaller than 100kb base_fee = self.relayfee*100 # our transactions are smaller than 100kb
txids = [] txids = []
# Create 3 batches of transactions at 3 different fee rate levels # Create 3 batches of transactions at 3 different fee rate levels
range_size = utxo_count // 3
for i in xrange(3): for i in xrange(3):
txids.append([]) txids.append([])
txids[i] = create_lots_of_big_transactions(self.nodes[0], self.txouts, utxos[30*i:30*i+30], (i+1)*base_fee) start_range = i * range_size
end_range = start_range + range_size
txids[i] = create_lots_of_big_transactions(self.nodes[0], self.txouts, utxos[start_range:end_range], (i+1)*base_fee)
# Make sure that the size of each group of transactions exceeds
# MAX_BLOCK_SIZE -- otherwise the test needs to be revised to create
# more transactions.
mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool(True)
sizes = [0, 0, 0]
for i in xrange(3):
for j in txids[i]:
assert(j in mempool)
sizes[i] += mempool[j]['size']
assert(sizes[i] > MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) # Fail => raise utxo_count
# add a fee delta to something in the cheapest bucket and make sure it gets mined # add a fee delta to something in the cheapest bucket and make sure it gets mined
# also check that a different entry in the cheapest bucket is NOT mined (lower # also check that a different entry in the cheapest bucket is NOT mined (lower
@ -47,7 +61,7 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.nodes[0].generate(1) self.nodes[0].generate(1)
mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool() mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()
print "Assert that prioritised transasction was mined" print "Assert that prioritised transaction was mined"
assert(txids[0][0] not in mempool) assert(txids[0][0] not in mempool)
assert(txids[0][1] in mempool) assert(txids[0][1] in mempool)
@ -60,7 +74,7 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert(high_fee_tx != None) assert(high_fee_tx != None)
# Add a prioritisation before a tx is in the mempool (de-prioritising a # Add a prioritisation before a tx is in the mempool (de-prioritising a
# high-fee transaction). # high-fee transaction so that it's now low fee).
self.nodes[0].prioritisetransaction(high_fee_tx, -1e15, -int(2*base_fee*COIN)) self.nodes[0].prioritisetransaction(high_fee_tx, -1e15, -int(2*base_fee*COIN))
# Add everything back to mempool # Add everything back to mempool
@ -70,8 +84,11 @@ class PrioritiseTransactionTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool() mempool = self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()
assert(high_fee_tx in mempool) assert(high_fee_tx in mempool)
# Now verify the high feerate transaction isn't mined. # Now verify the modified-high feerate transaction isn't mined before
self.nodes[0].generate(5) # the other high fee transactions. Keep mining until our mempool has
# decreased by all the high fee size that we calculated above.
while (self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['bytes'] > sizes[0] + sizes[1]):
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
# High fee transaction should not have been mined, but other high fee rate # High fee transaction should not have been mined, but other high fee rate
# transactions should have been. # transactions should have been.

@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ def assert_is_hash_string(string, length=64):
def satoshi_round(amount): def satoshi_round(amount):
return Decimal(amount).quantize(Decimal('0.00000001'), rounding=ROUND_DOWN) return Decimal(amount).quantize(Decimal('0.00000001'), rounding=ROUND_DOWN)
# Helper to create at least "count" utxos
# Pass in a fee that is sufficient for relay and mining new transactions.
def create_confirmed_utxos(fee, node, count): def create_confirmed_utxos(fee, node, count):
node.generate(int(0.5*count)+101) node.generate(int(0.5*count)+101)
utxos = node.listunspent() utxos = node.listunspent()
@ -475,6 +477,8 @@ def create_confirmed_utxos(fee, node, count):
assert(len(utxos) >= count) assert(len(utxos) >= count)
return utxos return utxos
# Create large OP_RETURN txouts that can be appended to a transaction
# to make it large (helper for constructing large transactions).
def gen_return_txouts(): def gen_return_txouts():
# Some pre-processing to create a bunch of OP_RETURN txouts to insert into transactions we create # Some pre-processing to create a bunch of OP_RETURN txouts to insert into transactions we create
# So we have big transactions (and therefore can't fit very many into each block) # So we have big transactions (and therefore can't fit very many into each block)
@ -501,6 +505,8 @@ def create_tx(node, coinbase, to_address, amount):
assert_equal(signresult["complete"], True) assert_equal(signresult["complete"], True)
return signresult["hex"] return signresult["hex"]
# Create a spend of each passed-in utxo, splicing in "txouts" to each raw
# transaction to make it large. See gen_return_txouts() above.
def create_lots_of_big_transactions(node, txouts, utxos, fee): def create_lots_of_big_transactions(node, txouts, utxos, fee):
addr = node.getnewaddress() addr = node.getnewaddress()
txids = [] txids = []

Loading…
Cancel
Save