Make check to distinguish between orphan txs and old txs more efficient.

Checking for the existence in the CCoinsViewCache of the outputs of a new tx
will result in a disk hit for every output since they will not be found.  On the
other hand if those outputs exist already, then the inputs must also have been
missing, so we can move this check inside the input existence check so in the
common case of a new tx it doesn't need to run.

The purpose of the check is to avoid spamming the orphanMap with slightly old
txs which we have already seen in a block, but it is already only optimistic
(depending on the outputs not being spent), so make it even more efficient by
only checking the cache and not the entire pcoinsTip.
pull/384/head
Alex Morcos 8 years ago
parent ac52492cd2
commit 18bacec6c2

@ -491,24 +491,20 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
CCoinsViewMemPool viewMemPool(pcoinsTip, pool);
view.SetBackend(viewMemPool);
// do we already have it?
for (size_t out = 0; out < tx.vout.size(); out++) {
COutPoint outpoint(hash, out);
bool had_coin_in_cache = pcoinsTip->HaveCoinInCache(outpoint);
if (view.HaveCoin(outpoint)) {
if (!had_coin_in_cache) {
coins_to_uncache.push_back(outpoint);
}
return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-already-known");
}
}
// do all inputs exist?
for (const CTxIn txin : tx.vin) {
if (!pcoinsTip->HaveCoinInCache(txin.prevout)) {
coins_to_uncache.push_back(txin.prevout);
}
if (!view.HaveCoin(txin.prevout)) {
// Are inputs missing because we already have the tx?
for (size_t out = 0; out < tx.vout.size(); out++) {
// Optimistically just do efficient check of cache for outputs
if (pcoinsTip->HaveCoinInCache(COutPoint(hash, out))) {
return state.Invalid(false, REJECT_DUPLICATE, "txn-already-known");
}
}
// Otherwise assume this might be an orphan tx for which we just haven't seen parents yet
if (pfMissingInputs) {
*pfMissingInputs = true;
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save