join with a timeout does not cause that the corresponding thread is stopped after the time-out. It does only cause that the waiting is stopped. Here we need additionally a signal to the thread to stop after we finished waiting.

git-svn-id: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/yacy/trunk@6069 6c8d7289-2bf4-0310-a012-ef5d649a1542

source/de/anomic/tools/DidYouMean.java

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 	private final IndexCell<WordReference> index;
 	private String word;
 	private int len;
+	private boolean stop;
 	
 	private Thread ChangingOneLetter;
 	private Thread AddingOneLetter;
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 		this.word = "";
 		this.len = 0;
 		this.index = index;
+		this.stop = false;
 		
 		this.ChangingOneLetter = new ChangingOneLetter();
 		this.AddingOneLetter = new AddingOneLetter();
@@ -61,6 +63,8 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 			this.ChangingOneLetter.join(TIMEOUT);
 			this.AddingOneLetter.join(TIMEOUT);
 		} catch (InterruptedException e) {
+		} finally {
+			stop = true;
 		}
 		
 		this.set.remove(word.toLowerCase());
@@ -82,6 +86,7 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 						set.add(s);
 						count++;
 					}
+					if (stop) return;
 				}
 			}
 		}
@@ -98,6 +103,7 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 					set.add(s);
 					count++;
 				}
+				if (stop) return;
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -114,6 +120,7 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 						set.add(s);
 						count++;
 					}
+					if (stop) return;
 				}			
 			}
 		}
@@ -130,6 +137,7 @@ public class DidYouMean {
 					set.add(s);
 					count++;
 				}
+				if (stop) return;
 			}
 		}
 	}