f59bee3fb2 fuzz: execute each file in dir without fuzz engine (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Phony fuzzing (phuzzing)! Run the fuzz testing code against known inputs to detect errors. Advantage is you can easily test using the existing qa-assets datasets without having to compile with fuzzing enabled; disadvantage is that it doesn't do any actual fuzzing.
Example usage:
```
$ for a in ${QA_ASSETS}/fuzz_seed_corpus/*; do echo ${a##*/}; done | xargs -P8 -I {} /bin/sh -c "FUZZ={} test/fuzz/fuzz ${QA_ASSETS}/fuzz_seed_corpus/{}"
No fuzzer for address_deserialize.
No fuzzer for addrdb.
No fuzzer for banentry_deserialize.
addition_overflow: succeeded against 848 files in 0s.
asmap: succeeded against 981 files in 0s.
checkqueue: succeeded against 211 files in 0s.
...
```
(`-P8` says run 8 of the tasks in parallel)
If there are failures, the first one will be reported and the program will abort with output like:
```
fuzz: test/fuzz/versionbits.cpp:336: void (anonymous namespace)::versionbits_fuzz_target(FuzzBufferType): Assertion `exp_state != ThresholdState::FAILED' failed.
Error processing seed "corpus/versionbits/35345ae8e722234095810b1117a29b63af7621af"
```
Rebase of #22763, which was a rebase of #21496, but also reports the name of the fuzzer and the time taken.
Fixes#21461
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d8d046d4a309652eb13de42116276bf992480bc887ad3535a8ff18b354cb24826bc562b06af63802ec945c637f046563b6a5601d6321b46a5543127daafea09b
f865cf8ded Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong)
28ba0313ea Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong)
12eb05df63 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong)
c600ee3816 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong)
42e56d9b18 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong)
3bbb6fea05 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong)
5be9ee3c54 refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes.
Here's the commit message, reproduced:
```
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
```
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK f865cf8ded ; code review only
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f865cf8ded 🗂
Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
2efdfb88aa gui: restore Send for external signer (Sjors Provoost)
4b5a6cd149 refactor: helper function signWithExternalSigner() (Sjors Provoost)
026b5b4523 move-only: helper function to present PSBT (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Fixes#551
For the simplest use case of a wallet with one external signer and "PSBT Controls" disabled in settings (the default), the send dialog will behave the same as when using a wallet with private keys. I.e. there's no "Create Unsigned" button.
When PSBT controls are turned on, you can now actually make a PSBT with signing it; before this PR that button would trigger a sign event and would broadcast the transaction.
In case a multisig, the Send button will sign on the device, and then fall back to presenting a PSBT (same behavior as before #441).
This PR starts with two refactoring commits to move some stuff into a helper function for improved readability in general, and to make the main commit easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
utACK 2efdfb88aa diff review since my last review, code re-review, rebased to current master, verified clean debug build of each commit
luke-jr:
utACK 2efdfb88aa
Tree-SHA512: e8731a0ef9e87564b2676c7b022b742d9621bba964c19dba9fd9f6961eb608737a9e1a22c0a3c8b2f2f6d583bba067606ee8392422e82082deefb20ea7b88c7c
12cc0201c2 contrib: fix signet miner (sighash mismatch) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
gruve-p reported that the signet miner doesn't work anymore (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24501#issuecomment-1062088351), failing with the following error of the `walletprocesspsbt` RPC:
```
error code: -22
error message:
Specified sighash value does not match value stored in PSBT
.....
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['bitcoin-cli', '-signet', '-stdin', 'walletprocesspsbt']' returned non-zero exit status 22
```
PSBT signing was changed to use SIGHASH_DEFAULT by default in #22514. The signet miner script sets the sighash type of the created PSBT to SIGHASH_ALL (3 is the per-input type PSBT_IN_SIGHASH_TYPE, following a little-endian 32 unsigned integer of the sighash type):
e04720ec33/contrib/signet/miner (L169-L170)
hence this leads to a sighash mismatch when the `walletprocesspsbt` RPC is called. Fix this by explicitly passing the correct sighash type. The same change was needed in one of our functional tests, see commit d3992669df.
Note that instead of feeding the PSBT via `-stdin` it is directly passed as parameter, as I couldn't figure out a way to pass multiple parameters otherwise (separating by newline also didn't work).
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
ACK 12cc0201c2
ajtowns:
ACK 12cc0201c2 ; code review only
Tree-SHA512: 8509e768e96f85e28c0ca0dc2d35874aa29623febddc46bf90472ec38f38cb3a1b5407c563fd9101d07088775d0fdb18e9137cc38955e847885b83c16591c736
e359ba6b35 doc: Drop a note about Intel-based Macs (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The work on building stuff during the recent months made the removed note obsolete.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK e359ba6b35
Tree-SHA512: 8cf851c8602ef004c9ca009a97345b828bacbb6ecf1eee803d3ce64870a9766c196849b8843237e7bc1be5697de928b759a6dfa0407022c144d23d0293322200
5347c9732f doc: update multisig-tutorial.md to default wallet type (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #24281 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24281#issuecomment-1033996386. The default wallet type was changed to descriptor wallets in #23002.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 5347c9732f
michaelfolkson:
ACK 5347c9732f
achow101:
ACK 5347c9732f
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 5347c9732f
Tree-SHA512: 8074a33ad253ecb7d3f78645a00c808c7c224996cc1748067928aa59ef31a58f24fcfc75169494b26a19c7fbbf23bbd78516ab4102bc52fa92f08f1f49b18b63
9a5b4d7892 doc: Delete old line of code that was commented out (Michael Folkson)
Pull request description:
In #23288 MarcoFalke [highlighted](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23288/files#r739817055) an old BOOST_CHECK that was commented out and replaced by a different BOOST_CHECK. I think this can be deleted and wasn't deliberately left in by achow101.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9a5b4d7892
jonatack:
ACK 9a5b4d7892
Tree-SHA512: 69aa71d362bb190c75d617766f6af945a43211ddb315ccfef5ebab2beefe020032d99f0d0d4b312aa349e605ba712a8bc91d7f0a22427681e08c95f8a6ea7e64
bce9aaf31e Unit tests for IsWitnessProgram and IsP2WSH. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This adds basic unit tests for `CScript::IsPayToWitnessScriptHash` and `CScript::IsWitnessProgram`, similar to the existing tests for `CScript::IsPayToScriptHash`. These tests are probably not super important given the other existing tests for segwit related code, but may be useful in catching some errors early.
This implements #14737.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
tACK bce9aaf31e (`make check)`.
Tree-SHA512: 3cff5efc4ac53079289c72bfba8b1937bc103baadd32bb1fba41e78017f65f9cca17678c3202ad0711eae42b351d4132d9ed9b4e2dc07d138298691a09c4e822
3c74f775ac Update signapple for platform identifier fix (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Apparently #23134 is caused by the platform identifier field being set to the incorrect value in our code signatures. The problem has been resolved in signapple, and so guix should point to the latest commit containing the fix.
I suppose guix does not strictly need to have this; only the macOS code signer will need to have the fix.
Fixes#23134
ACKs for top commit:
gruve-p:
ACK 3c74f775ac
hebasto:
re-ACK 3c74f775ac
fanquake:
ACK 3c74f775ac
Tree-SHA512: 7df844793fa77be4ddc4ef02f26980d6368b50421b7bd9a15f7d6a0c3b5c5f4f0cc0889e065689956583a2173875d33406dbe3a52a72c75a7f23a33c733c2378
fafe06c379 bench: Sort bench_bench_bitcoin_SOURCES (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc9b71 bench: Add logging benchmark (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Might make finding performance bottlenecks or regressions (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17218) easier.
For example, fuzzing relies on disabled logging to be as fast as possible.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK fafe06c379
Tree-SHA512: dd858f3234a4dfb00bd7dec4398eb076370a4b9746aa24eecee7da86f6882398a2d086e5ab0b7c9f7321abcb135e7ffc54cc78e60d18b90379c6dba6d613b3f7
893e18059f doc: rework dependencies.md (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This PR rewrites dependencies.md. The current list is hard to parse, includes information that is either incorrect and/or misleading, and duplicates info in other documentation. The list of dependencies is much smaller, because it's now just the actual dependencies of Bitcoin Core, not random Qt things, or the dependencies of other tooling. We don't need _another_ section on configure flag usage, or, to have duplicated lists of dependencies in other build docs, as that somewhat defeats the point of having dependencies.md, and just means more effort keeping things in sync.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 893e18059f
hebasto:
ACK 893e18059f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
jarolrod:
crACK 893e18059f
Tree-SHA512: 6750eaf70d5ebc9c364ade1d4b5b689e3094020eeb444a3de93b33d9a57a1577949a461f8209442d3954ccb22ab038c7e8cf6dfff5623e4f2713606b6798c37e
Before this change the send confirmation dialog would keep the Send option disabled. The Create Unsigned choice would actually send. This is potentially confusing.
With this change the Create Unsigned button will not attempt to sign and always produce a PSBT. The Send button will attempt to sign, and only return a PSBT if more signatures are needed.
When using an external signer, the Create Unsigned option only appears when PSBT controls are enabled in the wallet settings.
This commit maintains the pre-existing behavior of filling the PSBT (without signing) even when not using an external signer.
Closes#551
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
fad4c8934c Add RegisterMempoolRPCCommands helper (MarcoFalke)
fafd40b541 refactor: Avoid int64_t -> size_t -> int64_t conversion (MarcoFalke)
fa2a5f301a rpc: Move mempool RPCs to new file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `blockchain.cpp` file is quite large. This makes it harder to navigate and increases the memory required to compile.
Improve on both issues by splitting up the mempool RPCs to a separate file.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fad4c8934c.
theStack:
Code-review ACK fad4c8934c🏞️
Tree-SHA512: 7f13168ea2cbea51eaef05ca1604fddc919480a2128ec7fa6b1f9365ec5e4822c3df93eb408a19f038c627f2309fa282b9f7f7ec45e5e661fc728f6b33157f89
fa43933e3b ci: Temporarily use clang-13 to work around clang-14 TSan bug (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is an increase in intermittent issues in the TSan task. The increase correlates with Ubuntu Jammy's bump of `clang` from `clang-13` to `clang-14`.
Temporarily work around that.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa43933e3b, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: adf7d385e1cddaeb2d06c3a3838f87070fb4ffdcc9a37da204b332ab28f40042bd34bd8b6d1d4710511865b4acafa7cf7303c4abf59862c5d29b168e2774da31
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.
This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.
I strongly recommend reviewing with the following git-diff flags:
--color-moved=dimmed_zebra --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change
fa8d4d9128 scripted-diff: Clarify CheckFinalTxAtTip name (MarcoFalke)
fa4e30b0f3 policy: Remove unused locktime flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The locktime flags have many issues:
* They are passed in by a default argument, which is fragile. It has already lead to bugs like the one fixed in commit e30b6ea194.
* They are negative (signed), which doesn't make sense for flags (unsigned in general). According to the review comments when the code was added: "The max on the flags is a fairly weird operation." (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6566#issuecomment-150310861)
* No call site relies on the default argument and they all pass in a single compile-time constant, rendering most of the code dead and untested.
* The dead code calls `GetAdjustedTime` (network adjusted time), which has its own issues. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4521
Fix all issues by removing them
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa8d4d9128
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa8d4d9128
glozow:
ACK fa8d4d9128, agree the default arg `flags` is a massive footgun and just setting max flags is weird. Adding `AtTip` to the names makes sense to me, since they're both testing for *next* block and only ever used for {,re}addition to mempool.
Tree-SHA512: 79f4a52f34909eb598d88bbae7afe8abe5f85f45c128483d16aa83dacd0e5579e561b725d01b1e9a931d1821012a51ad2bc6fb2867f8d09ee541f9d234d696f8
PSBT signing was changed to use SIGHASH_DEFAULT by default in #22514.
The signet miner script sets the sighash type of the created PSBT to
SIGHASH_ALL, hence this leads to a sighash mismatch when the
`walletprocesspsbt` RPC is called. Fix this by explicitly passing the
correct sighash type.
Note that the same change was needed in one of our functional tests,
see commit d3992669df.
Reported by gruve-p.
fa8e76bb90 wallet: Add sanity checks to AntiFeeSnipe (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I added those sanity checks as part of implementing BIP 326, but I think they make sense on their own. The checks require the transaction to be passed in to `DiscourageFeeSniping`. Also, replace `(int)locktime` cast with the equivalent `int(locktime)` cast.
ACKs for top commit:
chris-belcher:
ACK fa8e76bb90
S3RK:
Code review ACK fa8e76bb90
achow101:
ACK fa8e76bb90
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK fa8e76bb90
Tree-SHA512: 6fe37c85f074851ef09cae8addcb836257089290fecec515c129c3180e9ccb64740aaac76043af10ce7c213e5001568ca6b4b62ae9631f0994ed676b07118074
61152183ab wallet: Add a deprecation warning for newly created legacy wallets (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
As we slowly deprecate legacy wallets, we need to warn users that are making new legacy wallets that their wallet type is going to be unsupported in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 61152183ab
S3RK:
reACK 61152183ab
theStack:
ACK 61152183ab
Tree-SHA512: e89bfb8168869542498958f0c9a2ab302dfd43287f8a49e7d9e09f60438a567bb8b7219a4e569797ee819b30b624f532fcc0b70c6aa0edcb392a301b8ce8b541
5d7c69b887 rpc: rename getdeploymentinfo status-next to status_next (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Rename the `status-next` field to `status_next` in getdeploymentinfo before the RPC is released in v23.
Before
```
Result:
{ (json object)
"hash" : "str", (string) requested block hash (or tip)
"height" : n, (numeric) requested block height (or tip)
"deployments" : { (json object)
"xxxx" : { (json object) name of the deployment
"type" : "str", (string) one of "buried", "bip9"
"height" : n, (numeric, optional) height of the first block which the rules are or will be enforced (only for "buried" type, or "bip9" type with "active" status)
"active" : true|false, (boolean) true if the rules are enforced for the mempool and the next block
"bip9" : { (json object, optional) status of bip9 softforks (only for "bip9" type)
"bit" : n, (numeric, optional) the bit (0-28) in the block version field used to signal this softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"start_time" : xxx, (numeric) the minimum median time past of a block at which the bit gains its meaning
"timeout" : xxx, (numeric) the median time past of a block at which the deployment is considered failed if not yet locked in
"min_activation_height" : n, (numeric) minimum height of blocks for which the rules may be enforced
"status" : "str", (string) status of deployment at specified block (one of "defined", "started", "locked_in", "active", "failed")
"since" : n, (numeric) height of the first block to which the status applies
"status-next" : "str", (string) status of deployment at the next block
"statistics" : { (json object, optional) numeric statistics about signalling for a softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"period" : n, (numeric) the length in blocks of the signalling period
"threshold" : n, (numeric, optional) the number of blocks with the version bit set required to activate the feature (only for "started" status)
"elapsed" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks elapsed since the beginning of the current period
"count" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks with the version bit set in the current period
"possible" : true|false (boolean, optional) returns false if there are not enough blocks left in this period to pass activation threshold (only for "started" status)
},
"signalling" : "str" (string) indicates blocks that signalled with a # and blocks that did not with a -
}
}
}
}
```
After
```
Result:
{ (json object)
"hash" : "str", (string) requested block hash (or tip)
"height" : n, (numeric) requested block height (or tip)
"deployments" : { (json object)
"xxxx" : { (json object) name of the deployment
"type" : "str", (string) one of "buried", "bip9"
"height" : n, (numeric, optional) height of the first block which the rules are or will be enforced (only for "buried" type, or "bip9" type with "active" status)
"active" : true|false, (boolean) true if the rules are enforced for the mempool and the next block
"bip9" : { (json object, optional) status of bip9 softforks (only for "bip9" type)
"bit" : n, (numeric, optional) the bit (0-28) in the block version field used to signal this softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"start_time" : xxx, (numeric) the minimum median time past of a block at which the bit gains its meaning
"timeout" : xxx, (numeric) the median time past of a block at which the deployment is considered failed if not yet locked in
"min_activation_height" : n, (numeric) minimum height of blocks for which the rules may be enforced
"status" : "str", (string) status of deployment at specified block (one of "defined", "started", "locked_in", "active", "failed")
"since" : n, (numeric) height of the first block to which the status applies
"status_next" : "str", (string) status of deployment at the next block
"statistics" : { (json object, optional) numeric statistics about signalling for a softfork (only for "started" and "locked_in" status)
"period" : n, (numeric) the length in blocks of the signalling period
"threshold" : n, (numeric, optional) the number of blocks with the version bit set required to activate the feature (only for "started" status)
"elapsed" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks elapsed since the beginning of the current period
"count" : n, (numeric) the number of blocks with the version bit set in the current period
"possible" : true|false (boolean, optional) returns false if there are not enough blocks left in this period to pass activation threshold (only for "started" status)
},
"signalling" : "str" (string) indicates blocks that signalled with a # and blocks that did not with a -
}
}
}
}
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4facfd7af3cfb7b6f5495758c4387602802f5e39d9270b162d17350a7f954eab0b74d895f17f0d8dfbc7814d36db7cff56d08c42728432885ea6f4e37aea4aa8
5ce3057c8e test: set segwit height back to 0 on regtest (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The change of `consensus.SegwitHeight` from 0 to 1 for regtest in #22818 had the effect that if I create a regtest enviroment with current master (or 23.x), and then try to load this chain with an older version (22.x), I get an InitError
`Witness data for blocks after height 0 requires validation. Please restart with -reindex`
and have to reindex because `BLOCK_OPT_WITNESS` is no longer set for the Genesis block and `NeedsRedownload()` in validation returns `true` with an older version.
That might be a bit annoying for tests that use a shared regtest dir with different versions.
If people think this is enough of an issue to be worth fixing, I think it should also make it into 23.x
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 5ce3057c8e
Tree-SHA512: b0e89ff7fc953bc0ae929d2da44cde7149321d987fb4763934f6c9635d00d807129a50b459cc5e69e86bb1819e4b063b969486e8016a1cb8db8f905fa315653d
aab552fa30 test: use MiniWallet for feature_maxuploadtarget.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR enables one more of the non-wallet functional tests (feature_maxuploadtarget.py) to be run even with the Bitcoin Core wallet disabled by using the MiniWallet instead, as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20078. Note that the adapted helper function `mine_large_block` is currently only is used in this test, i.e. there was no need to change any others.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
crACK aab552fa30
Tree-SHA512: 82fb962ae40e3717419b063af295fc03ac5d5dfe4266dee8ba7f6c86800ede1d32f8fa632c189c30e982badf0c6083fcf6eca4798221f6e284c5e01a8b1a1ed9
339b4a51f6 build: don't install deprecated libevent headers (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We don't use the deprecated headers now, and never should do in the
future, so there is no need for them to exist in depends.
The headers themselves are just full of includes for the newer headers.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 339b4a51f6
Tree-SHA512: 736fd9e3b22212da462cc05203dd253806dc59f973090357b705f2742ed4a3b8c3cc44b3173d706527f60ad93e95cf4143ec6b7db4233a489890a98f8e5c8f07
fae20e6b50 Revert "Avoid the use of P0083R3 std::set::merge" (MarcoFalke)
fab53b5fd4 ci/doc: Set minimum required clang/libc++ version to 8.0 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is not for 23.0, but for 24.0. It comes with the following benefits:
* Can use C++17 P0083R3 std::set::merge from libc++ 8.0
* No longer need to provide support for clang-7, which already fails to compile on some architectures (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21294#issuecomment-998098483)
This should be fine, given that all supported operating systems ship with at least clang-10:
* CentOS 8: clang-12
* Stretch: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/clang-11
* Buster: https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/clang-11
* Bionic: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic-updates/clang-10
* Focal: https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/clang-10
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fae20e6b50 - I think this is fine to do. I would be surprised if in another 6 months time someone was stuck on a system we supported, needing to compile Core, and only had access to Clang 7 or older. As mentioned in the PR description, all systems we currently support, already support multiple newer versions of Clang.
hebasto:
ACK fae20e6b50, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 3b4c6c130ff40dd7e84934af076863415e5dd661d823c72e3e3832566c65be6e877a7ef9164bbcf394bcea4b897fc29a48db0f231c22ace0e2c9b5638659a628
ec7d73628a [wallet] assert BnB internally calculated waste is the same as GetSelectionWaste() (glozow)
Pull request description:
#22009 introduced a `GetSelectionWaste()` function to determine how much "waste" a coin selection solution has, and is a mirror of the waste calculated inside of `SelectCoinsBnB()`. It would be bad for these two waste metrics to deviate, since it could negatively affect how often we select the BnB solution. Add an assertion to help tests catch a potential accidental change.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ec7d73628a
Xekyo:
ACK ec7d73628a
Tree-SHA512: 3ab7ad45ae92e7ce3f21824fb975105b6be8382edf47c252df5d13d973a3abdcb675132d223b42fcbb669cca879672c904b8a58d0676e12bf381a9219f4db37c
e8272024ab doc: Use human-friendly DefaultHint for change_address/changeAddress in wallet RPC help (Luke Dashjr)
9d5e693c9d Bugfix: doc: Correct type of change_address/changeAddress in wallet RPC help (STR, not STR_HEX) (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e8272024ab
Tree-SHA512: da4db2b241160c93ea66f8c572c69d4688f52a5fd8c32b66b1192925fcb360baf91be9771eaca178f5b08e1920559174260ed57caddcffade48156ec0c83c0bc
40e871d9b4 [miner] always assume we can create witness blocks (glozow)
Pull request description:
Given the low possibility of a reorg reverting the segwit soft fork, there is no longer a need to check whether segwit is active to see if it's okay to add to the block template (see also #23512, #21009, etc). `TestBlockValidity()` is also run on the block template at the end of `CreateNewBlock()`, so any invalid block would be caught there.
ACKs for top commit:
gruve-p:
ACK 40e871d9b4
jnewbery:
utACK 40e871d9b4, although I disagree about changing the test for segwit transaction in mempool before activagtion, instead of just removing it: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24421#discussion_r822933721.
achow101:
ACK 40e871d9b4
theStack:
Code-review ACK 40e871d9b4
Tree-SHA512: bf4860bf2bed8339622d05228d11d60286edb0c32a9a3c434b8d154913c07ea56e50649f4af7009c2a1c6a58a81d2299ab43b41a6f16dee7d08cc89cc1603019
These two implementations of waste calculation should never deviate.
Still keep the SelectCoinsBnB internal calculation because incremental
calculate-as-you-go is much more performant than calling
GetSelectionWaste() over and over again.
MarcoFalke