Fix getbalance discrepency

Two changes:

Use IsConfirmed() instead of IsFinal(), so 'getbalance "*" 0' uses the same
'is this output spendable' criteria as 'getbalance'. Fixes issue #172.

And a tiny refactor to CWallet::GetBalance() (redundant call to IsFinal -- IsConfirmed
calls IsFinal).
getbalance with no arguments and 'getbalance "*" 0' could return different different results,
pull/2272/head
Gavin Andresen 12 years ago
parent 77052ab0f3
commit d28bd8b7ca

@ -519,12 +519,12 @@ Value getbalance(const Array& params, bool fHelp)
if (params[0].get_str() == "*") { if (params[0].get_str() == "*") {
// Calculate total balance a different way from GetBalance() // Calculate total balance a different way from GetBalance()
// (GetBalance() sums up all unspent TxOuts) // (GetBalance() sums up all unspent TxOuts)
// getbalance and getbalance '*' should always return the same number. // getbalance and getbalance '*' 0 should return the same number
int64 nBalance = 0; int64 nBalance = 0;
for (map<uint256, CWalletTx>::iterator it = pwalletMain->mapWallet.begin(); it != pwalletMain->mapWallet.end(); ++it) for (map<uint256, CWalletTx>::iterator it = pwalletMain->mapWallet.begin(); it != pwalletMain->mapWallet.end(); ++it)
{ {
const CWalletTx& wtx = (*it).second; const CWalletTx& wtx = (*it).second;
if (!wtx.IsFinal()) if (!wtx.IsConfirmed())
continue; continue;
int64 allFee; int64 allFee;

@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ int64 CWallet::GetBalance() const
for (map<uint256, CWalletTx>::const_iterator it = mapWallet.begin(); it != mapWallet.end(); ++it) for (map<uint256, CWalletTx>::const_iterator it = mapWallet.begin(); it != mapWallet.end(); ++it)
{ {
const CWalletTx* pcoin = &(*it).second; const CWalletTx* pcoin = &(*it).second;
if (pcoin->IsFinal() && pcoin->IsConfirmed()) if (pcoin->IsConfirmed())
nTotal += pcoin->GetAvailableCredit(); nTotal += pcoin->GetAvailableCredit();
} }
} }

Loading…
Cancel
Save