You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
207 lines
8.4 KiB
207 lines
8.4 KiB
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2016-2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
"""Test account RPCs.
|
|
|
|
RPCs tested are:
|
|
- getaccountaddress
|
|
- getaddressesbyaccount
|
|
- listaddressgroupings
|
|
- setaccount
|
|
- sendfrom (with account arguments)
|
|
- move (with account arguments)
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
|
from test_framework.util import assert_equal
|
|
|
|
class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
|
self.setup_clean_chain = True
|
|
self.num_nodes = 1
|
|
self.extra_args = [[]]
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
node = self.nodes[0]
|
|
# Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes
|
|
assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0)
|
|
|
|
# Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into
|
|
# the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/50 each
|
|
node.generate(1)
|
|
node.generate(101)
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 100)
|
|
|
|
# there should be 2 address groups
|
|
# each with 1 address with a balance of 50 Bitcoins
|
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings()
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2)
|
|
# the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the
|
|
# common address
|
|
linked_addresses = set()
|
|
for address_group in address_groups:
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_group), 1)
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2)
|
|
assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 50)
|
|
linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0])
|
|
|
|
# send 50 from each address to a third address not in this wallet
|
|
# There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward
|
|
# matures.
|
|
common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr"
|
|
txid = node.sendmany(
|
|
fromaccount="",
|
|
amounts={common_address: 100},
|
|
subtractfeefrom=[common_address],
|
|
minconf=1,
|
|
)
|
|
tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid)
|
|
fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee']
|
|
# there should be 1 address group, with the previously
|
|
# unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance)
|
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings()
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1)
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2)
|
|
assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses)
|
|
assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0])
|
|
|
|
node.generate(1)
|
|
|
|
# we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected.
|
|
# otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined
|
|
# and matures in the next 100 blocks
|
|
node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee)
|
|
amount_to_send = 1.0
|
|
|
|
# Create accounts and make sure subsequent account API calls
|
|
# recognize the account/address associations.
|
|
accounts = [Account(name) for name in ("a", "b", "c", "d", "e")]
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name))
|
|
account.verify(node)
|
|
|
|
# Send a transaction to each account, and make sure this forces
|
|
# getaccountaddress to generate a new receiving address.
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
node.sendtoaddress(account.receive_address, amount_to_send)
|
|
account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name))
|
|
account.verify(node)
|
|
|
|
# Check the amounts received.
|
|
node.generate(1)
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
node.getreceivedbyaddress(account.addresses[0]), amount_to_send)
|
|
assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account.name), amount_to_send)
|
|
|
|
# Check that sendfrom account reduces listaccounts balances.
|
|
for i, account in enumerate(accounts):
|
|
to_account = accounts[(i+1) % len(accounts)]
|
|
node.sendfrom(account.name, to_account.receive_address, amount_to_send)
|
|
node.generate(1)
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
account.add_receive_address(node.getaccountaddress(account.name))
|
|
account.verify(node)
|
|
assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account.name), 2)
|
|
node.move(account.name, "", node.getbalance(account.name))
|
|
account.verify(node)
|
|
node.generate(101)
|
|
expected_account_balances = {"": 5200}
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
expected_account_balances[account.name] = 0
|
|
assert_equal(node.listaccounts(), expected_account_balances)
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(""), 5200)
|
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can assign an account to a new unused address.
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
address = node.getaccountaddress("")
|
|
node.setaccount(address, account.name)
|
|
account.add_address(address)
|
|
account.verify(node)
|
|
assert(address not in node.getaddressesbyaccount(""))
|
|
|
|
# Check that addmultisigaddress can assign accounts.
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
addresses = []
|
|
for x in range(10):
|
|
addresses.append(node.getnewaddress())
|
|
multisig_address = node.addmultisigaddress(5, addresses, account.name)
|
|
account.add_address(multisig_address)
|
|
account.verify(node)
|
|
node.sendfrom("", multisig_address, 50)
|
|
node.generate(101)
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(account.name), 50)
|
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can change the account of an address from a
|
|
# different account.
|
|
change_account(node, accounts[0].addresses[0], accounts[0], accounts[1])
|
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can change the account of an address which
|
|
# is the receiving address of a different account.
|
|
change_account(node, accounts[0].receive_address, accounts[0], accounts[1])
|
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can set the account of an address already
|
|
# in the account. This is a no-op.
|
|
change_account(node, accounts[2].addresses[0], accounts[2], accounts[2])
|
|
|
|
# Check that setaccount can set the account of an address which is
|
|
# already the receiving address of the account. It would probably make
|
|
# sense for this to be a no-op, but right now it resets the receiving
|
|
# address, causing getaccountaddress to return a brand new address.
|
|
change_account(node, accounts[2].receive_address, accounts[2], accounts[2])
|
|
|
|
class Account:
|
|
def __init__(self, name):
|
|
# Account name
|
|
self.name = name
|
|
# Current receiving address associated with this account.
|
|
self.receive_address = None
|
|
# List of all addresses assigned with this account
|
|
self.addresses = []
|
|
|
|
def add_address(self, address):
|
|
assert_equal(address not in self.addresses, True)
|
|
self.addresses.append(address)
|
|
|
|
def add_receive_address(self, address):
|
|
self.add_address(address)
|
|
self.receive_address = address
|
|
|
|
def verify(self, node):
|
|
if self.receive_address is not None:
|
|
assert self.receive_address in self.addresses
|
|
assert_equal(node.getaccountaddress(self.name), self.receive_address)
|
|
|
|
for address in self.addresses:
|
|
assert_equal(node.getaccount(address), self.name)
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
set(node.getaddressesbyaccount(self.name)), set(self.addresses))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def change_account(node, address, old_account, new_account):
|
|
assert_equal(address in old_account.addresses, True)
|
|
node.setaccount(address, new_account.name)
|
|
|
|
old_account.addresses.remove(address)
|
|
new_account.add_address(address)
|
|
|
|
# Calling setaccount on an address which was previously the receiving
|
|
# address of a different account should reset the receiving address of
|
|
# the old account, causing getaccountaddress to return a brand new
|
|
# address.
|
|
if address == old_account.receive_address:
|
|
new_address = node.getaccountaddress(old_account.name)
|
|
assert_equal(new_address not in old_account.addresses, True)
|
|
assert_equal(new_address not in new_account.addresses, True)
|
|
old_account.add_receive_address(new_address)
|
|
|
|
old_account.verify(node)
|
|
new_account.verify(node)
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
WalletAccountsTest().main()
|