1e46d8a Get rid of ambiguous OutputType::NONE value (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Based on suggestion by @sipa https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool to indicate parse failure, and a new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes. It's noted in the release notes.
Follows up #12408 by @MarcoFalke
Followups for future PRs:
- [ ] Add explicit support for specifying "auto" in `ParseOutputType` as suggested by promag and sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#issuecomment-374799567 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969481
- [ ] Add wallet `AddressChangeType` method to complement `TransactionChangeType`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969618.
Tree-SHA512: 8b08b272bcb177a0a9e556dcd965840a7fe601ef83ca97938b879c9b1a33b5b3f96939e1bceef11ba7c644ac21bfd6c1dbc6ca715cd1da4ace50475240e4ee48
d8e9a2a Remove "rpc" category from GetWarnings (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7da3b0a rpc: Move RPC_FORBIDDEN_BY_SAFE_MODE code to reserved section (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2ae705d Remove Safe mode (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Rebase of #10563. Safe mode was [disabled by default and deprecated in 0.16](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-notes/release-notes-0.16.0.md#safe-mode-disabled-by-default), so probably should be removed for 0.17.
> Rationale:
>
> Safe mode is useless. It only disables some RPC commands when large work forks are detected. Nothing else is affected by safe mode. It seems that very few people would be affected by safe mode. The people who use Core as a wallet are primarily using it through the GUI, which safe mode does not effect. In the GUI, transactions will still be made as normal; only a warning is displayed.
>
> I also don't think that we should be disabling RPC commands or any functionality in general. If we do, it should be done consistently, which safe mode is not. If we want to keep the idea of a safe mode around, I think that the current system needs to go first before a new system can be implemented.
Tree-SHA512: 067938f47ca6e879fb6c3c4e21f9946fd7c5da3cde67ef436f1666798c78d049225b9111dc97064f42b3bc549d3915229fa19ad5a634588f381e34fc65d64044
7d0f80b Use anonymous namespace instead of static functions (Pieter Wuille)
b61fb71 Mention removal of bare multisig IsMine in release notes (Pieter Wuille)
9c2a8b8 Do not treat bare multisig as IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
08f3228 Optimization: only test for witness scripts at top level (Pieter Wuille)
3619735 Track difference between scriptPubKey and P2SH execution in IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
ac6ec62 Switch to a private version of SigVersion inside IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
19fc973 Do not expose SigVersion argument to IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
fb1dfbb Remove unused IsMine overload (Pieter Wuille)
952d821 Make CScript -> CScriptID conversion explicit (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently our wallet code will treat bare multisig outputs (meaning scriptPubKeys with multiple public keys + `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` operator in it) as ours without the user asking for it, as long as all private keys in it are in our wallet.
This is a pointless feature. As it only works when all private keys are in one place, it's useless compared to single key outputs (P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH), and worse in terms of space, cost, UTXO size, and ability to test (due to lack of address format for them).
Furthermore, they are problematic in that producing a list of all `scriptPubKeys` we accept is not tractable (it involves all combinations of all public keys that are ours). In further wallet changes I'd like to move to a model where all scriptPubKeys that are treated as ours are explicit, rather than defined by whatever keys we have. The current behavior of the wallet is very hard to model in such a design, so I'd like to get rid of it.
I think there are two options:
* Remove it entirely (do not ever accept bare multisig outputs as ours, unless watched)
* Only accept bare multisig outputs in situations where the P2SH version of that output would also be acceptable
This PR implements the first option. The second option was explored in #12874.
Tree-SHA512: 917ed45b3cac864cee53e27f9a3e900390c576277fbd6751b1250becea04d692b3b426fa09065a3399931013bd579c4f3dbeeb29d51d19ed0c64da75d430ad9a
41ff967 list the types of scripts we should consider for a witness program (fivepiece)
4f933b3 p2wpkh, p2wsh and p2sh-nested scripts in decodescript (fivepiece)
Pull request description:
Attempts to address #12244 . `p2wsh` addresses are returned only for scripts that are neither `p2sh` nor any witness program.
Tree-SHA512: eb47f094c1a4c2ad2bcf27a8032307e43cf787d50bf739281aeb4101d97316a2f307b05118bf138298c937fa34e15f91436443a9b313f809fad2c43e94cd1831
7de1de7 Add new fee structure with all sub-fields denominated in BTC (mryandao)
Pull request description:
the denomination for `fee` is current in btc while the other such as `decendentFee` and `ancestorFee` are in satoshis.
Tree-SHA512: e428f6dca1d339f89ab73e38ce5903f5465c46b159069d9bcc3f8b1140fe6657fa49a11abe0088e9f7ba9999f64af72a349a4735bf5eaa61b8e4a185b23543f3
fa811b0 qa: Normalize executable location (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the need to override the executable locations by just reading them from the config file. Beside making the code easier to read, running individual test on Windows is now possible by default (without providing further command line arguments).
Note: Of course, it is still possible to manually specify the location through the `BITCOIND` environment variable, e.g. `bitcoin-qt`.
Tree-SHA512: bee6d22246796242d747120ca18aaab089f73067de213c9111182561985c5912228a0b0f7f9eec025ecfdb44db031f15652f30d67c489d481c995bb3232a7ac7
fac0db0 wallet: Make fee settings non-static members (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet header defined some globals (they were called "settings"), that should be class members instead.
This commit is hopefully only refactoring, apart from a multiwallet bugfix: Calling the rpc `settxfee` for one wallet, would set (and change) the fee rate for all loaded wallets. (See added test case)
Tree-SHA512: 4ab6ec2f5c714742396ded5e451ec3b1ceb771e3696492de29889d866de4365b3fbe4a2784d085c8b8bd11b1ebb8a1fec99ab2c62eee716791cfc67c0cf29e1b
cead28b [docs] Add release notes for deprecated 'account' API (John Newbery)
72c9575 [wallet] [tests] Add tests for accounts/labels APIs (John Newbery)
109e05d [wallet] [rpc] Deprecate wallet 'account' API (John Newbery)
3576ab1 [wallet] [rpc] Deprecate account RPC methods (John Newbery)
3db1ba0 [tests] Set -deprecatedrpc=accounts in tests (John Newbery)
4e671f0 [tests] Rename rpc_listtransactions.py to wallet_listtransactions.py (John Newbery)
a28b907 [wallet] [rpc] Remove duplicate entries in rpcwallet.cpp's CRPCCommand table (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Deprecate all accounts functionality and make it only accessible by using `-deprecatedrpc=accounts`.
Accounts specific RPCs, account arguments, and account related results all require the `-deprecatedrpc=accunts` startup option now in order to see account things.
Several wallet functional tests use the accounts system. Those tests are unchanged, except to start the nodes with `-deprecatedrpc=accounts`. We can slowly migrate those tests to use the 'label' API instead of the 'account' API before accounts are fully removed.
Tree-SHA512: 89f4ae2fe6de4a1422f1817b0997ae22d63ab5a1a558362ce923a3871f3e42963405d6573c69c27f1764679cdee5b51bf52202cc407f1361bfd8066d652f3f37
8b8032e test: Add rpcauth pair that generated by rpcauth (Chun Kuan Lee)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a rpcauth pair that is randomly generated. Also checks that rpcauth.py works fine.
Resolve#12995
Tree-SHA512: d9661f40e306bcf528dc25919c874ebcdbdd21101319985dc12ce133c80fd0021cfee5e4bfe8ee7970eccc2e24c97e596263b270fe0b79f3613ae573a825ed63
09b30db Asserts that the tx version number is a signed 32-bit integer. (251)
Pull request description:
This PR attempts to resolve#11561 by addressing the feedback from @MarcoFalke; and @gmaxwell in #12430.
Commit 30e9d24 adds a functional test to `rpc_rawtransaction.py` to assert that the transaction version number in the RPC output is a signed 32-bit integer.
The functional test uses the raw transaction data from Mainnet transaction `c659729a7fea5071361c2c1a68551ca2bf77679b27086cc415adeeb03852e369`.
Tree-SHA512: d78f3120b9aa04537561ab5584769a838b25e162c5caa6e1543256fb27538aa4c708c939fb5ba93ccb3fa676c2d92ce8eb9cc78869f80ac96be64a7bec7bebd0
1accfbc Output values for "min relay fee not met" error (Kristaps Kaupe)
Pull request description:
It is already done this way for "mempool min fee not met" error.
Tree-SHA512: 829db78ecc066cf93b8e93ff1aeb4e7b98883cf45f341d5be6e6b4dff4135f3f54fa49b3a6f12eb43f676a9ba54f981143c9887f786881e584370434a9566cfd
80a5e59 [qa] Attach node index to test_node AssertionError and print messages (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
In the midst of fighting with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12873 it became apparent that there're a number of assertions and print statements which are emitted by test nodes but don't identify the node in question. This change makes debugging a bit easier by adding identifying information to non-logger test_node-related error messages.
Tree-SHA512: 7cc86f2c81f4b3fdba15ec9a2d21a84c4b083629e845e82288087c3affbbdc5c68e74067621856cc97fe84fbc8cb4f5ca4977a51ef381e5d74515df8eb001239
1f83839 [wallet] [tests] Test disallowed multiwallet params (John Newbery)
3476e3c [wallet] Fix zapwallettxes/multiwallet interaction. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
`-zapwallettxes` should be disallowed when starting bitcoin in multiwallet mode.
There's code in `WalletInit::ParameterInteraction()` to disallow `-zapwallettxes` when running in multiwallet mode. This code functioned as expected when passing the parameter `-zapwallettxes=1`, but not when passing the parameter `-zapwallettxes` (ie without the value specified). Fix that and add a test.
The new test in the
_[wallet] [tests] Test disallowed multiwallet params_ commit reproduces the bug and should fail against master.
Fixes#12505
Tree-SHA512: 6cd921717e9c7d2773ca84c946c310c2adec8430e37cbecdb33a620f510db3058a72bd328411812ba415111bc52a3367b332c9d15a37a92ccfd7ae785d2f32ab
e87fefc test: Add rpc_bind test to default-run tests (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Skip the parts that cannot be run on the host due to lack of IPv6 support or a second interface to bind on, and warn appropriately.
Without no strong requirements (besides being Linux only, which will skip the test) left, add this test to the default in test_runner.
~~(the non-IPv6 parts of the two dual-IPv4/6 tests could also be enabled, but first going to look what Travis does here to see if there wasn't another reason it was disabled)~~ done, it only makes sense for the first
Tree-SHA512: 724259b14f59dccc7e61ef071359336adb0f76a63db392b6ce6940e21c8ee0470c35374e82970681261685ef299cd70b0c1372598cea85d341f64c2c40ea28ee
c1d742025c [tests] Fix feature_block flakiness (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
feature_block.py occasionally fails on Travis. I believe this is due to
a a race condition when reconnecting to bitcoind after a subtest that
expects disconnection. If the test runs ahead and sends the INV for the
subsequent test before we've received the initial sync getheaders, then
we may end up sending two headers messages - one as a response to the
initial sync getheaders and one in response to the INV getheaders. If
both of those headers fail validation with a DoS score of 50 or higher,
then we'll unexpectedly be disconnected.
There is only one validation failure that has a DoS score bewteen 50 and
100, which is high-hash. That's why the test is failing immediately
after the "Reject a block with invalid work" subtest.
Fix is to wait for the initial getheaders from the peer before we
start populating our blockstore. That way we won't have any invalid
headers to respond to it with.
Tree-SHA512: dc17d795fcfaf0f8c0bf1e9732b5e11fbc8febbfafba4c231b7c13a5404a2c297dcd703a7a75bc7f353c893e12efc87f424f2201abd47ba5268af32d4d2e841f
feature_block.py occasionally fails on Travis. I believe this is due to
a a race condition when reconnecting to bitcoind after a subtest that
expects disconnection. If the test runs ahead and sends the INV for the
subsequent test before we've received the initial sync getheaders, then
we may end up sending two headers messages - one as a response to the
initial sync getheaders and one in response to the INV getheaders. If
both of those headers fail validation with a DoS score of 50 or higher,
then we'll unexpectedly be disconnected.
There is only one validation failure that has a DoS score bewteen 50 and
100, which is high-hash. That's why the test is failing immediately
after the "Reject a block with invalid work" subtest.
Fix is to wait for the initial getheaders from the peer before we
start populating our blockstore. That way we won't have any invalid
headers to respond to it with.
Such outputs can still be watched, and signed for, but they aren't treated as valid payments.
That means they won't cause transactions to appear in listtransactions, their outputs to be
shown under listunspent, or affect balances.
8b56fc0b91 [qa] Test that v0 segwit outputs can't be spent pre-activation (Suhas Daftuar)
ccb8ca42a4 Always enforce SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS with P2SH (Suhas Daftuar)
5c31b20a35 [qa] Remove some pre-activation segwit tests (Suhas Daftuar)
95749a5836 Separate NULLDUMMY enforcement from SEGWIT enforcement (Suhas Daftuar)
ce650182f4 Use P2SH consensus rules for all blocks (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
As discussed at the IRC meeting back in October (https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2017-10-12/?msg=92231929&page=2), I had looked into the feasibility of enforcing P2SH and SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS back to the genesis block.
The P2SH change is pretty straightforward -- there was only one historical block on mainnet that violated the rule, so I carved out an exception to it, similar to the way we have exceptions for the BIP30 violators.
The segwit change is not entirely as clear. The code changes themselves are relatively straightforward: we can just always turn on SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS whenever P2SH is active. However conceptually, this amounts to splitting up BIP141 into two parts, the part that implements new script rules, and the part that handles witness commitments in blocks.
Arguably though the script rules are really defined in BIP 143 anyway, and so this really amounts to backdating BIP 143 -- script rules for v0 segwit outputs -- back to genesis. So maybe conceptually this isn't so bad...
I don't feel strongly about this change in either direction; I started working on it because I was searching for a way to simplify the way we understand and implement the consensus rules around segwit, but I'm not yet sure whether I think this achieves anything toward that goal.
ping @TheBlueMatt
Tree-SHA512: 73551d4a983eb9792c7ac67f56005822528ac4d1fd52c27cee6d305ebee953f69687ef4ddee8bdc0fec77f77e6b5a9d669750793efee54c076533a095e233042
9e50c337c Note new weight field in release-notes. (Matt Corallo)
d0d9112b7 Test new weight field in p2p_segwit (Matt Corallo)
2874709a9 Expose a transaction's weight via RPC (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This seems like an obvious oversight.
Tree-SHA512: defd047de34fb06a31f589e1a4eef68fcae85095cc67b7c8fb434237bb40300d7f3f97e852d3e7226330e26b96943846b7baf6da0cfc79db8d56e9c1f7848ad9
All account RPC methods are now deprecated and can only be called if
bitcoind has been started with the -deprecatedrpc=accounts switch.
Affected RPC methods are:
- getaccount
- getaccountaddress
- getaddressesbyaccount
- getreceivedbyaccount
- listaccouts
- listreceivedbyaccount
- move
- setaccount
c25321f Add config changes to release notes (Anthony Towns)
5e3cbe0 [tests] Unit tests for -testnet/-regtest in [test]/[regtest] sections (Anthony Towns)
005ad26 ArgsManager: special handling for -regtest and -testnet (Anthony Towns)
608415d [tests] Unit tests for network-specific config entries (Anthony Towns)
68797e2 ArgsManager: Warn when ignoring network-specific config setting (Anthony Towns)
d1fc4d9 ArgsManager: limit some options to only apply on mainnet when in default section (Anthony Towns)
8a9817d [tests] Use regtest section in functional tests configs (Anthony Towns)
30f9407 [tests] Unit tests for config file sections (Anthony Towns)
95eb66d ArgsManager: support config file sections (Anthony Towns)
4d34fcc ArgsManager: drop m_negated_args (Anthony Towns)
3673ca3 ArgsManager: keep command line and config file arguments separate (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The weekly meeting on [2017-12-07](http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-12-07-19.00.log.html) discussed allowing options to bitcoin to have some sensitivity to what network is in use. @theuni suggested having sections in the config file:
<cfields> an alternative to that would be sections in a config file. and on the
cmdline they'd look like namespaces. so, [testnet] port=5. or -testnet::port=5.
This approach is (more or less) supported by `boost::program_options::detail::config_file_iterator` -- when it sees a `[testnet]` section with `port=5`, it will treat that the same as "testnet.port=5". So `[testnet] port=5` (or `testnet.port=5` without the section header) in bitcoin.conf and `-testnet.port=5` on the command line.
The other aspect to this question is possibly limiting some options so that there is no possibility of accidental cross-contamination across networks. For example, if you're using a particular wallet.dat on mainnet, you may not want to accidentally use the same wallet on testnet and risk reusing keys.
I've set this up so that the `-addnode` and `-wallet` options are `NETWORK_ONLY`, so that if you have a bitcoin.conf:
wallet=/secret/wallet.dat
upnp=1
and you run `bitcoind -testnet` or `bitcoind -regtest`, then the `wallet=` setting will be ignored, and should behave as if your bitcoin.conf had specified:
upnp=1
[main]
wallet=/secret/wallet.dat
For any `NETWORK_ONLY` options, if you're using `-testnet` or `-regtest`, you'll have to add the prefix to any command line options. This was necessary for `multiwallet.py` for instance.
I've left the "default" options as taking precedence over network specific ones, which might be backwards. So if you have:
maxmempool=200
[regtest]
maxmempool=100
your maxmempool will still be 200 on regtest. The advantage of doing it this way is that if you have `[regtest] maxmempool=100` in bitcoin.conf, and then say `bitcoind -regtest -maxmempool=200`, the same result is probably in line with what you expect...
The other thing to note is that I'm using the chain names from `chainparamsbase.cpp` / `ChainNameFromCommandLine`, so the sections are `[main]`, `[test]` and `[regtest]`; not `[mainnet]` or `[testnet]` as might be expected.
Thoughts? Ping @MeshCollider @laanwj @jonasschnelli @morcos
Tree-SHA512: f00b5eb75f006189987e5c15e154a42b66ee251777768c1e185d764279070fcb7c41947d8794092b912a03d985843c82e5189871416995436a6260520fb7a4db
Future commits will deprecate the accounts RPC methods, arguments and
return objects. Set the -deprecatedrpc=accounts switch now so tests
don't break in intermediate commits.
9db48c5634 tests: Remove redundant bytes² (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to #12993. As @jnewbery noted `bytes()` is idempotent.
Tree-SHA512: 0eb25e0c2c46f9abaac30f964c5eb422bece1414c840a717d86794424294cb19d995a6db7c8df2a2f4ec84776b05274a637f2c111738f397051f510e57184752
Wladimir J. van der Laan