Create a fee_rate (sat/vB) RPC param and replace overloading the conf_target and
estimate_mode params in the following 6 RPCs with it:
- sendtoaddress
- sendmany
- send
- fundrawtransaction
- walletcreatefundedpsbt
- bumpfee
In RPC bumpfee, the previously existing fee_rate remains but the unit is changed
from BTC/kvB to sat/vB. This is a breaking change, but it should not be an
overly risky one, as the units change by a factor of 1e5 and any fees specified
in BTC/kvB after this commit will either be too low and raise an error or be 1
sat/vB and can be RBFed.
Update the test coverage for each RPC.
Co-authored-by: Murch <murch@murch.one>
0be29000c0 rpc: update conf_target helps for correctness/consistency (Jon Atack)
778b9be406 wallet, rpc: fix send subtract_fee_from_outputs help (Jon Atack)
603c005083 wallet: add rpc send explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
dd341e602d wallet: add sendtoaddress/sendmany explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
44e7bfa603 wallet: add walletcreatefundedpsbt explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
6e1ea4273e test: refactor for walletcreatefundedpsbt fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
3ac7b0c6f1 wallet: fundrawtx fee rate coverage, fixup ParseConfirmTarget() (Jon Atack)
2d8eba8f84 wallet: combine redundant bumpfee invalid params and args tests (Jon Atack)
1697a40b6f wallet: improve bumpfee error/help, add explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
fc5721723d wallet: fix SetFeeEstimateMode() error message (Jon Atack)
052427eef1 wallet, bugfix: fix bumpfee with explicit fee rate modes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #11413 providing a base to build on for #19543:
- bugfix for `bumpfee` raising a JSON error with explicit feerates, fixes issue #20219
- adds explicit feerate test coverage for `bumpfee`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send`, `sendtoaddress`, and `sendmany`
- improves a few related RPC error messages and `ParseConfirmTarget()` / error message
- fixes/improves the explicit fee rate information in the 6 RPC helps, of which 2 were also missing `conf_target` sat/B units
This provides a spec and regression coverage for the potential next step of a universal `sat/vB` feerate argument (see #19543), as well as immediate coverage and minimum fixes for 0.21.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Concept/Tested ACK 0be29000c0
meshcollider:
Code review + functional test run ACK 0be29000c0
Tree-SHA512: efd965003e991cba51d4504e2940f06ab3d742e34022e96a673606b44fad85596aa03a8c1809f06df7ebcf21a38e18a891e54392fe3d6fb4d120bbe4ea0cf5e0
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
# max-depth=0 excludes test/functional/test_framework/...
FILES=$(git grep -l --max-depth 0 "connect_nodes" test/functional)
# Replace (dis)?connect_nodes(self.nodes[a], b) with self.(dis)?connect_nodes(a, b)
sed -i 's/\b\(dis\)\?connect_nodes(self\.nodes\[\(.*\)\]/self.\1connect_nodes(\2/g' $FILES
# Remove imports in the middle of a line
sed -i 's/\(dis\)\?connect_nodes, //g' $FILES
sed -i 's/, \(dis\)\?connect_nodes//g' $FILES
# Remove imports on a line by themselves
sed -i '/^\s*\(dis\)\?connect_nodes,\?$/d' $FILES
sed -i '/^from test_framework\.util import connect_nodes$/d' $FILES
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Elliott Jin <elliott.jin@gmail.com>
A later scripted-diff commit replaces the majority of uses, which all
follow this pattern:
(dis)?connect_nodes(self.nodes[a], b)
This commit replaces the few "special cases".
b048b275d9 [validation] Remove absurdfee from accepttomempool (John Newbery)
932564b9cf scripted-diff: update max-fee-exceeded error message to include RPC (gzhao408)
8f1290c601 [rpc/node] check for high fee before ATMP in clients (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Picked up from #15810. Add separate fee-checking logic for clients that need to enforce max fee rates, then remove the `absurdFee` logic from ATMP.
ATMP's `nAbsurdFee` argument is used to enforce user-specific behavior (it is not policy since it isn't applied consistently: it is only ever used in RPC and wallet, and set to 0 everywhere else internally). It should be removed from `AcceptToMemoryPool` because (1) validation results/mempool behavior should not be user-specific and (2) enforcing a max fee rate should be the responsibility of the client instead of the mempool.
Note: this PR does not intend to _remove_ protection from high fees, just re-delegate the responsibility to clients.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b048b275d9
LarryRuane:
re-ACK b048b275d9
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK b048b275d9 , only change is squashing one commit 🏦
instagibbs:
utACK b048b275d9
Tree-SHA512: 57c17ba16d230a4cae2896dd6a64c924f307757824e35784bf96da7b10aff2d8ea910710edf35e981035623a155f8766209a92a0fdb856549fde78bc3eaae4d2
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/Fee exceeds maximum configured by \-\maxtxfee/Fee exceeds maximum configured by user (e.g. -maxtxfee, maxfeerate)/g' src/util/error.cpp test/functional/rpc_fundrawtransaction.py test/functional/rpc_psbt.py test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py test/functional/wallet_bumpfee.py test/functional/wallet_create_tx.py
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
6d1f51343c [rpc] fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt lock manually selected coins (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When using `fundrawtransaction` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` with `lockUnspents`, it would only lock automatically selected coins, not manually selected coins. That doesn't make much sense to me if the goal is to prevent accidentally double-spending yourself before you broadcast a transaction.
Note that when creating a transaction, manually selected coins are automatic "unlocked" (or more accurately: the lock is ignored). Earlier versions of this PR introduced an error when a locked coin is manually selected, but this idea was abandoned after some discussion. An application that uses this RPC should either rely on automatic coin selection (with `lockUnspents`) or handle lock concurrency itself with manual coin selection. In particular it needs to make sure to avoid/pause calls with automatic coin selection between calling `lockunspent` and the subsequent spending RPC.
See #7518 for historical background.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 6d1f51343c
fjahr:
Code review ACK 6d1f51343c
Tree-SHA512: 8773c788d92f2656952e1beac147ba9956b8c5132d474e0880e4c89ff53642928b4cbfcd1cb3d17798b9284f02618a8830c93a9f7a4733e5bded96adff1d5d4d
substitutes "for x in range(N):" by "for _ in range(N):"
indicates to the reader that a block is just repeated N times, and
that the loop counter is not used in the body
Checks that the RPC decodepsbt calculates the fee correctly, in particular for
PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type
set. Before commit 75122780e2 ("Increment input
value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt") the values for those inputs were
double counted.
931dd47608 Make lint-spelling.py happy (Glenn Willen)
11a0ffb29d [gui] Load PSBT from clipboard (Glenn Willen)
a6cb0b0c29 [gui] PSBT Operations Dialog (sign & broadcast) (Glenn Willen)
5dd0c03ffa FillPSBT: report number of inputs signed (or would sign) (Glenn Willen)
9e7b23b733 Improve TransactionErrorString messages. (Glenn Willen)
Pull request description:
Add a "PSBT Operations" dialog, reached from the "Load PSBT..." menu item, giving options to sign or broadcast the loaded PSBT as appropriate, as well as copying the result to the clipboard or saving it to a file.
This is based on Sjors' #17509, and depends on that PR going in first. (It effectively replaces the small "load PSBT" dialog from that PR with a more feature-rich one.)
Some notes:
* The way I display status information is maybe unusual (a status bar, rather than messageboxes.) I think it's helpful to have the information in it be persistent rather than transitory. But if people dislike it, I would probably move the "current state of the transaction" info to the top line of the main label, and the "what action just happened, and did it succeed" info into a messagebox.
* I don't really know much about the translation/localization stuff. I put tr() in all the places it seemed like it ought to go. I did not attempt to translate the result of TransactionErrorString (which is shared by GUI and non-GUI code); I don't know if that's correct, but it matches the "error messages in logs should be googleable in English" heuristic. I don't know whether there are things I should be doing to reduce translator effort (like minimizing the total number of distinct message strings I use, or something.)
* I don't really know how (if?) automated testing is applied to GUI code. I can make a list of PSBTs exercising all the codepaths for manual testing, if that's the right approach. Input appreciated.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
tested ACK 931dd47608
Sjors:
re-tACK 931dd47608
jb55:
ACK 931dd47608
achow101:
ACK 931dd47608
Tree-SHA512: ade52471a2242f839a8bd6a1fd231443cc4b43bb9c1de3fb5ace7c5eb59eca99b1f2e9f17dfdb4b08d84d91f5fd65677db1433dd03eef51c7774963ef4e2e74f
e5327f947c [rpc] fundrawtransaction: add_inputs option to control automatic input adding (Sjors Provoost)
79804fe24b [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: don't automatically append inputs (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, `walletcreatefundedpsbt` now fails if the amount is insufficient, unless `addInputs` is set to `true`.
Similarly for `fundrawtransaction` if the original transaction already specified inputs, we only add more if `addInputs` is set to `true`.
This protects against fat finger mistakes in the amount or fee rate (see also #16257). The behavior is also more similar to GUI coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5327f947c
meshcollider:
utACK e5327f947c
Tree-SHA512: d8653b820914396c7c25b0d0a2b7e92de214aa023bc1aa085feb37d3b20fab361ebea90416a7db989f19bdc37e26cf0adfbcb712c80985c87afa67a9bd44fecb
Adds a --descriptors option globally to the test framework. This will
make the test create and use descriptor wallets. However some tests may
not work with this.
Some tests are modified to work with --descriptors and run with that
option in test_runer:
* wallet_basic.py
* wallet_encryption.py
* wallet_keypool.py
* wallet_keypool_topup.py
* wallet_labels.py
* wallet_avoidreuse.py
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, we now fail if the amount is insufficient, unless addInputs is set to true.
5bad7921d0 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c9061 [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
In decodepsbt if an invalid amount is seen, don't calculate the fee
but still show the invalid value in the decode.
In analyze psbt, if an invalid amount is seen, set the next step to
be the creator as the creator needs to remake the transaction so that
it is valid.
773d4572a4 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb60 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK 773d4572a4
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
fadfd844de test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke)
fa3b9ee8b2 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
faaee1e39a test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke)
1111bb91f5 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side).
This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times.
Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests.
Historic background:
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fadfd844de
jonasschnelli:
utACK fadfd844de - more of less a cleanup PR.
promag:
Tested ACK fadfd844de, ran extended tests.
Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
c0b5d97103 Test that joinpsbts randomly shuffles the inputs (Andrew Chow)
6f405a1d3b Shuffle inputs and outputs after joining psbts (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`joinpsbts` currently just adds the inputs and outputs in the order of that the PSBTs were provided. This makes it extremely easy to identify which outputs belong to which inputs. This PR changes that so that all of the inputs and outputs are shuffled in the joined transaction.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK c0b5d97103
jonatack:
ACK c0b5d97103 modulo suggestions for later.
Tree-SHA512: 14a0b7aae07d92e6d2c76a3a3b228b481e1964cb7d34f97515bdda18e2ea05a9f97c5a22affc143b86ae8b95c3cb239849fb54219d65512bc2112264dca915c8
0d101a340c test: Add test for maxtxfee option (MarcoFalke)
177550101b wallet: Remove unreachable code in CreateTransaction (MarcoFalke)
5c1b9714cb wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to CWallet::CreateTransaction (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Follow up to #16257, this PR makes `bumpfee` aware of `-maxtxfee`.
It also prevents dangling locked unspents when calling `fundrawtransaction` - because the previous check was after `LockCoin`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 0d101a340c, only change is small test fixup
Tree-SHA512: 3464b24ae7cd4e72ed41438c6661828ba1304af020f05da62720b23668ae734e16cf47c6d97e150cc84ef631ee099b16fc786c858f3d089905845437338fd512
The new `descriptors` argument needs to be added to the Command and
ConvertParams tables to by usable as a named argument and by
bitcoin-cli.
Also update the test to use named arguments to test this.
26fe9b9909 Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
3135c1a2d2 Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille)
fb90ec3c33 Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
eaf4f88734 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means:
* Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known.
* P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs.
This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 26fe9b9909
laanwj:
utACK 26fe9b9909 (will hold merging until response to promag's comments)
promag:
ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later.
Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245
FundTransaction calls GetMinimumFee which, when the fee rate is absurdly high, quietly reduced the fee to -maxtxfee. Becaue an absurdly high fee rate is usually the result of a fat finger, aborting seems safer behavior.
This adds a descriptors argument to the utxoupdatepsbt RPC. This means:
* Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known
* P2SH-witness outputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor
is provided to show they're segwit outputs.
c87fc71f7e Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Correct test description comment (Luke Dashjr)
097c4aa379 Bugfix: test/functional/rpc_psbt: Remove check for specific error message that depends on uncertain assumptions (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
When converttopsbt is called with a signed transaction, it either fails with "TX decode failed" if one or more inputs were segwit, or "Inputs must not have scriptSigs and scriptWitnesses" otherwise.
Since no effort is made by the test to ensure the inputs are segwit or not, avoid checking the exact message used.
The error code is still checked to ensure it is of the correct kind of failure.
ACKs for commit c87fc7:
instagibbs:
utACK c87fc71f7e
achow101:
utACK c87fc71f7e
Tree-SHA512: 61312b5d49aa50652902f30ba9693dfba9e5b7e6478f23becda20202d8b328ddb3e040f2199b617a68df133a5f1f8b5d68bc19d4621303f17c1963dca01bd9ef
Jon Atack