fa4e09924b refactor: Replace validation.h include with forward-decl in miner.h (MarcoFalke)
fa0739a7d3 style: Sort file list after rename (MarcoFalke)
fa53e3a58c scripted-diff: Move miner to src/node (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is impossible to run the miner without a node (validation, chainstate, mempool, rpc, ...). Also, the module is in the node library. Thus, it should be moved to `src/node`.
Also, replace the `validation.h` include in the header with a forward-declaration.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa4e09924b
Tree-SHA512: 791e6caa5839d8dc83b0f58f3f49bc0a7e3c1710822e8a44dede254c87b6f7531a0586fb95e8a067c181457a3895ad6041718aa2a2fac64cfc136bf04bb851d5
29173d6c6c ubsan: add minisketch exceptions (Cory Fields)
54b5e1aeab Add thin Minisketch wrapper to pick best implementation (Pieter Wuille)
ee9dc71c1b Add basic minisketch tests (Pieter Wuille)
0659f12b13 Add minisketch dependency (Gleb Naumenko)
0eb7928ab8 Add MSVC build configuration for libminisketch (Pieter Wuille)
8bc166d5b1 build: add minisketch build file and include it (Cory Fields)
b2904ceb85 build: add configure checks for minisketch (Cory Fields)
b6487dc4ef Squashed 'src/minisketch/' content from commit 89629eb2c7 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This takes over #21859, which has [recently switched](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21859#issuecomment-921899200) to my integration branch. A few more build issues came up (and have been fixed) since, and after discussing with sipa it was decided I would open a PR to shepherd any final changes through.
> This adds a `src/minisketch` subtree, taken from the master branch of https://github.com/sipa/minisketch, to prepare for Erlay implementation (see #21515). It gets configured for just supporting 32-bit fields (the only ones we're interested in in the context of Erlay), and some code on top is added:
> * A very basic unit test (just to make sure compilation & running works; actual correctness checking is done through minisketch's own tests).
> * A wrapper in `minisketchwrapper.{cpp,h}` that runs a benchmark to determine which field implementation to use.
Only changes since my last update to the branch in the previous PR have been rebasing on master and fixing an issue with a header in an introduced file.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 29173d6c6c
Tree-SHA512: 1217d3228db1dd0de12c2919314e1c3626c18a416cf6291fec99d37e34fb6eec8e28d9e9fb935f8590273b8836cbadac313a15f05b4fd9f9d3024c8ce2c80d02
In #21738 an ASAN suppression for nanobench was added. This is not needed any more,as nanobench.h already includes the necessary suppressions for the relevant code.
fa03d0acd6 fuzz: Create a block template in tx_pool targets (MarcoFalke)
fa61ce5cf5 fuzz: Limit mocktime to MTP in tx_pool targets (MarcoFalke)
fab646b8ea fuzz: Use correct variant of ConsumeRandomLengthString instead of hardcoding a maximum size (MarcoFalke)
fae2c8bc54 fuzz: Allow to pass min/max to ConsumeTime (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Relatively simple check to ensure a block can always be created from the mempool
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK fa03d0acd6
Tree-SHA512: e613376ccc88591cbe594db14ea21ebc9b2b191f6325b3aa4ee0cd379695352ad3b480e286134ef6ee30f043d486cf9792a1bc7e44445c41045ac8c3b931c7ff
fa957f8dc9 test: Add race:SendZmqMessage tsan suppression (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Add suppression for `race:SendZmqMessage`, which isn't covered by the existing `zmq::*` suppression
Fixes#20618
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK fa957f8dc9, as my previous comment is not directly related to this pull changes.
Tree-SHA512: 8642a8b79bbfa4bee89042b66e528f27fd78c5e84a33023df440662e9114e31445fd7b04940f44b11fa4ab7438d346385a21816289c818cce9958a9b16730452
5e146022da wallet: fix scanning progress calculation for single block range (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes are equal, and with that also the estimated start/stop verification progress values) the progress calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero (0.0/0.0), resulting in an invalid JSON result for the `getwalletinfo` RPC. This PR fixes this behaviour by setting the progress to zero in that special case. Fixes#20297.
The behaviour can easily be reproduced by continuously running single block rescans in an endless loop, e.g. via
```bash
#!/bin/bash
while true
do
bitcoin-cli rescanblockchain $(bitcoin-cli getblockcount)
done
```
and at the same time perform some `getwalletinfo` RPCs.
On the master branch, this leads to frequent invalid responses (tested on mainchain):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo
error: couldn't parse reply from server
$ curl --user `cat ~/.bitcoin/.cookie` --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getwalletinfo", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
{"result":{"walletname":"","walletversion":169900,"format":"bdb","balance":0.00000000,"unconfirmed_balance":0.00000000,"immature_balance":0.00000000,"txcount":0,"keypoololdest":1603677276,"keypoolsize":1000,"hdseedid":"3196e33ecb47c7130e6ca60f2f895f9259860dca","keypoolsize_hd_internal":1000,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"private_keys_enabled":true,"avoid_reuse":false,"scanning":{"duration":0,"progress":},"descriptors":false},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}
```
(note that missing value for "progress" in the JSON result).
On the PR branch, the behaviour doesn't occur anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e146022da
promag:
Core review ACK 5e146022da.
Tree-SHA512: f0e6aad5a6cd08b36c5fe820fff0ef26663229b39169a4dbe757f3c795a41cf5c69c9dc90efe7515675ae1059307f8971123781a0514d10704123a6f28b125ab
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes
are equal, and with that also the estimated verification progress) the progress
calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero, resulting in
an invalid JSON result for the getwalletinfo RPC. Fixed by setting the progress
to zero in that special case.
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/PeerLogicValidation/PeerManager/g' $(git grep -l PeerLogicValidation ./src ./test)
sed -i 's/peer_logic/peerman/g' $(git grep -l peer_logic ./src ./test)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
PeerLogicValidation was originally net_processing's implementation to
the validation interface. It has since grown to contain much of
net_processing's logic. Therefore rename it to reflect its
responsibilities.
Suggested in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10756#pullrequestreview-53892618.
MarcoFalke