xorriso and its mkisofs/genisoimage emulation alter-ego xorrisofs are
more maintained, and has the right toggles for us to achieve output
determinism without using blunt tools like faketime.
In this commit, we use xorrisofs from the build environment rather than
building it ourselves using depends. This is not necessary and can be
changed in the future.
From https://wiki.debian.org/genisoimage?action=recall&rev=11 :
> The classical command line interface for production of ISO 9660
> filesystem images is the option set established by program mkisofs.
> For reasons of licensing and other problems with its author, Debian
> ships a fork of mkisofs, called genisoimage, which was split off in
> 2006 and then developed independently.
>
> Meanwhile, genisoimage gets no new features and not even bug fixes. It
> is first choice only if its options -udf or -hfs are needed.
>
> Replacement in most uses cases, especially for bootable ISO 9660
> filesystems, archiving, and backup, is xorrisofs which starts the -as
> mkisofs emulation mode of program xorriso.
Without the fix, the tests immediately abort:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name not valid
./qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt: line 2: 116150 Aborted
This avoids timeouts when signing a large raw transaction
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5009228131729408?command=ci#L4981
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: 'signrawtransactionwithwallet' RPC took longer than 120.000000 seconds. Consider using larger timeout for calls that take longer to return. (-344)
0e2a5e448f tests: dumping and minimizing of script assets data (Pieter Wuille)
4567ba034c tests: add generic qa-asset-based script verification unit test (Pieter Wuille)
f06e6d0345 tests: functional tests for Schnorr/Taproot/Tapscript (Pieter Wuille)
3c226639eb tests: add BIP340 Schnorr signature support to test framework (Pieter Wuille)
206fb180ec --- [TAPROOT] Tests --- (Pieter Wuille)
d7ff237f29 Activate Taproot/Tapscript on regtest (BIP 341, BIP 342) (Pieter Wuille)
e9a021d7e6 Make Taproot spends standard + policy limits (Pieter Wuille)
865d2c37e2 --- [TAPROOT] Regtest activation and policy --- (Pieter Wuille)
72422ce396 Implement Tapscript script validation rules (BIP 342) (Johnson Lau)
330de894a9 Use ScriptExecutionData to pass through annex hash (Pieter Wuille)
8bbed4b7ac Implement Taproot validation (BIP 341) (Pieter Wuille)
0664f5fe1f Support for Schnorr signatures and integration in SignatureCheckers (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
5de246ca81 Implement Taproot signature hashing (BIP 341) (Johnson Lau)
9eb590894f Add TaggedHash function (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
450d2b2371 --- [TAPROOT] BIP340/341/342 consensus rules --- (Pieter Wuille)
5d62e3a68b refactor: keep spent outputs in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
8bd2b4e784 refactor: rename scriptPubKey in VerifyWitnessProgram to exec_script (Pieter Wuille)
107b57df9f scripted-diff: put ECDSA in name of signature functions (Pieter Wuille)
f8c099e220 --- [TAPROOT] Refactors --- (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is an implementation of the Schnorr/taproot consensus rules proposed by BIPs [340](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), [341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), and [342](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki).
See the list of commits [below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#issuecomment-691815830). No signing or wallet support of any kind is included, as testing is done entirely through the Python test framework.
This is a successor to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977 (see discussion following [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977#issuecomment-682285983)), and will have further changes squashed/rebased. The history of this PR can be found in #19997.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 0e2a5e448f
benthecarman:
reACK 0e2a5e4
kallewoof:
reACK 0e2a5e448f
jonasnick:
ACK 0e2a5e448f almost only looked at bip340/libsecp related code
jonatack:
ACK 0e2a5e448f modulo the last four commits (tests) that I plan to finish reviewing tomorrow
fjahr:
reACK 0e2a5e448f
achow101:
ACK 0e2a5e448f
Tree-SHA512: 1b00314450a2938a22bccbb4e177230cf08bd365d72055f9d526891f334b364c997e260c10bc19ca78440b6767712c9feea7faad9a1045dd51a5b96f7ca8146e
This adds a unit test that does generic script verification tests,
with positive/negative witnesses/scriptsigs, under various flags.
The test data is large (several MB) so it's stored in the qa-assets
repo.
33df8d46bb ci: Build Arm64 on Travis without functional tests (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The Travis Arm64 env is a pretty big PITA for quite a while now. It simply seems to time out due to a lack of resources as far as I can tell from my research into the matter.
I have reported the issue in August and received no response: https://travis-ci.community/t/arm64-failing-without-message/9775. Others have complained about similar issues with Arm64 over the past year. The explanation for this is probably that this env is still considered to be in beta: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/multi-cpu-architectures.
Considering the high frequency of failures (I didn't run any numbers, just based on my personal observations) and the beta status I would suggest that we shorten the runtime by removing part of the test suite until the env is more stable. I would suggest removing functional tests since it should help for sure but maybe there are other ideas.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 33df8d46bb
Tree-SHA512: 55b0c658b526611d16a26e9508611ddeecbfbd842ec064ada61d188a8be2f473e080c2a35746a9aae8006b11b0c2ab9dd4639b0f3004ecf821506e26c7345972
fdf697fe75 ci: Increase CCACHE_SIZE in some builds on Travis (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR will decrease build time for the longest Travis builds.
Up to ~20 min improvement with warmed up cache is expected.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ee3a22162d03537be11e60b53de043247f6a65e35e630e0807b758a846b7e05ef2059d18846644aafa3cd5dc7d3e3f56a8ccb94cc71b95227debc9201d3142a2
870f0cd2a0 build: Add MemorySanitizer (MSan) in Travis to detect use of uninitialized memory (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add MemorySanitizer (MSan) in Travis to detect use of uninitialized memory.
First UBSan, then ASan followed by TSan... and now: yes, the wait is over -- **MSan is finally here!** :)
Some historical context:
* 2017: Continuous compilation with Clang Thread Safety analysis enabled (#10866, #10923)
* 2018: Continuous testing with trapping on signed integer overflows (`-ftrapv`) (#12686)
* 2018: Continuous testing of use of locale dependent functions (#13041)
* 2018: Continuous testing of format strings (#13705)
* 2018: Continuous compilation with MSVC `TreatWarningAsError` (#14151)
* 2018: Continuous testing under UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer – UBSan (#14252, #14673, #17006)
* 2018: Continuous testing under AddressSanitizer – ASan (#14794, #17205, #17674)
* 2018: Continuous testing under ThreadSanitizer – TSan (#14829)
* 2019: Continuous testing in an unsigned char environment (`-funsigned-char`) (#15134)
* 2019: Continuous compile-time testing of assumptions we're making (#15391)
* 2019: Continuous testing of fuzz test cases under Valgrind (#17633, #18159, #18166)
* 2020: Finally... MemorySanitizer – MSAN! :)
What is the next step? What tools should we add to CI to keep bugs from entering `master`? :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 870f0cd2a0
Tree-SHA512: 38327c8b75679d97d469fe42e704cacd1217447a5a603701dd8a58ee50b3be2c10248f8d68a479ed081c0c4b254589d3081c9183f991640b06ef689061f75578
faca73000f ci: Install fixed version of clang-format for linters (MarcoFalke)
fa4695da4c build: Sort Makefile.am after renaming file (MarcoFalke)
cccc2784a3 scripted-diff: Move ui_interface to the node lib (MarcoFalke)
fa72ca6a9d qt: Remove unused includes (MarcoFalke)
fac96e6450 wallet: Do not include server symbols (MarcoFalke)
fa0f6c58c1 Revert "Fix link error with --enable-debug" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts a hacky workaround from commit b83cc0f, which only happens to work due to compiler optimizations. Then, it actually fixes the linker error.
The underlying problem is that the wallet includes symbols from the server (ui_interface), which usually results in linker failures. Though, in this specific case the linker failures have not been observed (unless `-O0`) because our compilers were smart enough to strip unused symbols.
Fix the underlying problem by creating a new header-only with the needed symbol and move ui_interface to node to clarify that this is part of libbitcoin_server.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK faca730
laanwj:
ACK faca73000f
hebasto:
re-ACK faca73000f, since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19331#pullrequestreview-434420539) review:
Tree-SHA512: e9731f249425aaea50b6db5fc7622e10078cf006721bb87989cac190a2ff224412f6f8a7dd83efd018835302337611f5839e29e15bef366047ed591cef58dfb4
a92e48b02d test: move TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA into native tsan setup (fanquake)
Pull request description:
`feature_block.py` is being run in the tsan job, i.e [here](https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/703122309), even though it should be excluded. My hasty assumption is that this will fix it. In any case, all other instances of `TEST_RUNNER_EXTRA` seem to have moved out of `.travis.yml` and into the different CI configurations.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK a92e48b02d
practicalswift:
ACK a92e48b02d -- patch looks correct
hebasto:
ACK a92e48b02d, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 86057bef2cc87c6acdbbf94f8cd7a5147510448c3e67aacde8daf247e3ccf649cfc5afbbd10693e084f426042d98150616c0e49bfa5f32b949dff9cebd2fd95d
fa74a54fad ci: Increase test timeout for sanitizer configs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Hopefully fixes#19369
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa74a54fad -- patch looks correct!
fanquake:
ACK fa74a54fad - the test failure here is a different issue, and the problem referenced by this PR hasn't occurred, so I think this can be merged. It's also fixing the use of `--factor` which was replaced in #18986.
Tree-SHA512: bec44fff454f20b7c5f8a461560d2496765dea61186027cc0cdce5ac55be0488b6f7f172fec49b89fe59a75b455501e2b4ae91a98c4a17d5c1a722846d2b3b60
39d526bde4 test: Bump linter versions (Duncan Dean)
Pull request description:
As per #19346, `mypy==0.700` was incompatible with Python 3.8.
I've bumped the versions of all the linters to their latest stable versions.
Checked with both Python 3.7 and 3.8 and everything still seems to work fine.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 39d526bde4, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: f3ee7fda8095aa25aa68685e863076d52a6b82649770d24b0064d652763c0ceb8ebcbf9024fc74fca45c754e67b2a831dd070b3af23bc099140e6d27e89a5319
adf543d714 darwin: pass mlinker-version so that clang enables new features (Cory Fields)
2418f739f7 macos: Bump to xcode 11.3.1 and 10.15 SDK (Cory Fields)
5c2c835433 depends: bump MacOS toolchain (Cory Fields)
85b5e42088 contrib: macdeploy: Remove historical extraction notes (Carl Dong)
351beb5c9a contrib: macdeploy: Use apple-sdk-tools instead of xar+pbzx (Carl Dong)
fbcfcf6954 native_cctools: Don't use libc++ from pinned clang (Carl Dong)
3381e4a189 Adapt rest of tooling to new SDK naming scheme (Carl Dong)
b3394ab235 contrib: macdeploy: Correctly generate macOS SDK (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This PR achieves 3 main things:
1. It simplifies the macOS SDK generation by putting the logic inside a (semi-)portable python3 script `gen-sdk`
2. It transitions us to using `libc++` headers extracted from the `Xcode.app`, which is more correct as those headers better match the `.tbd` library stubs we use from the `MacOSX.sdk` (located under the same `Xcode.app`). Previously, we used `libc++` headers copied from our downloaded, pinned clang (see `native_cctools.mk`).
3. It bumps the macOS toolchain in a way that fulfills all of the following constraints:
1. The new SDK should support compiling with C++17 (our current one doesn't)
2. The new toolchain should not change our minimum supported macOS version (`-mmacosx-version-min`)
3. The new toolchain should expect to use a version of `cctools` that is supported by https://github.com/tpoechtrager/cctools-port
For the constraints in (3), you can reference [this chart](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcode#Xcode_7.0_-_11.x_(since_Free_On-Device_Development)) to see that the newest toolchain we can use with our `cctools-port` is `11.3.1`, and the rest of the constraints were tested with local builds.
#### But [the other Wikipedia chart](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xcode#Xcode_11.x_(since_SwiftUI_framework)) says that the "min macOS to run" for Xcode 11.3.1 is 10.14.4, doesn't that violate constraint (ii)?
This confused me at first too, but the "min macOS to run" is for the Xcode.app App itself. The SDK still supports 10.12, as evident in a few plist files and as proven through local builds.
#### Why bundle all of this together in a single PR?
We need (1) and (2) together, because if we don't, manually adding the `libc++` headers and writing that out in a `README.md` is going to result in a lot of user error, so it's great to have these together to be more correct and also make it easier on the user at the same time.
We need (3) together with everything else because bumping (or in the case of (1), renaming) the SDK requires some human coordination and may break some builds. And since it's not that complicated a change, it makes sense to do it together with the rest.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
ACK adf543d714.
fanquake:
ACK adf543d714 - I'll take a look at the linker issue.
Tree-SHA512: 3813b69ebfe9610bee14100f26296fb5438d9bf0dd184ea55e6c38f5ebd94f7c171d98b150fc9e52fde626533f347f7ec51a2b72b79859d946284f578c1084a3
Updates Python linters, spellchecking, and ShellCheck versions. The PR links are updated for
the dependency versions in test/README.md. ShellCheck SC2230 removed to align with with new
behaviour in v0.7.1.
Fixes#19346.
losh11