|
|
|
@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
|
|
|
|
|
RPCs tested are:
|
|
|
|
|
- getaccountaddress
|
|
|
|
|
- getaddressesbyaccount
|
|
|
|
|
- listaddressgroupings
|
|
|
|
|
- setaccount
|
|
|
|
|
- sendfrom (with account arguments)
|
|
|
|
|
- move (with account arguments)
|
|
|
|
@ -30,16 +31,57 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
|
|
|
self.nodes = start_nodes(self.num_nodes, self.options.tmpdir, self.node_args)
|
|
|
|
|
self.is_network_split = False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def run_test (self):
|
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
|
|
|
node = self.nodes[0]
|
|
|
|
|
# Check that there's no UTXO on any of the nodes
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(node.listunspent()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Note each time we call generate, all generated coins go into
|
|
|
|
|
# the same address, so we call twice to get two addresses w/50 each
|
|
|
|
|
node.generate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
node.generate(101)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 50)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounts = ["a","b","c","d","e"]
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(), 100)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# there should be 2 address groups
|
|
|
|
|
# each with 1 address with a balance of 50 Bitcoins
|
|
|
|
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings()
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 2)
|
|
|
|
|
# the addresses aren't linked now, but will be after we send to the
|
|
|
|
|
# common address
|
|
|
|
|
linked_addresses = set()
|
|
|
|
|
for address_group in address_groups:
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_group), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_group[0]), 2)
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(address_group[0][1], 50)
|
|
|
|
|
linked_addresses.add(address_group[0][0])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# send 50 from each address to a third address not in this wallet
|
|
|
|
|
# There's some fee that will come back to us when the miner reward
|
|
|
|
|
# matures.
|
|
|
|
|
common_address = "msf4WtN1YQKXvNtvdFYt9JBnUD2FB41kjr"
|
|
|
|
|
txid = node.sendmany(
|
|
|
|
|
fromaccount="",
|
|
|
|
|
amounts={common_address: 100},
|
|
|
|
|
subtractfeefrom=[common_address],
|
|
|
|
|
minconf=1,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
tx_details = node.gettransaction(txid)
|
|
|
|
|
fee = -tx_details['details'][0]['fee']
|
|
|
|
|
# there should be 1 address group, with the previously
|
|
|
|
|
# unlinked addresses now linked (they both have 0 balance)
|
|
|
|
|
address_groups = node.listaddressgroupings()
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups), 1)
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(address_groups[0]), 2)
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(set([a[0] for a in address_groups[0]]), linked_addresses)
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal([a[1] for a in address_groups[0]], [0, 0])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node.generate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# we want to reset so that the "" account has what's expected.
|
|
|
|
|
# otherwise we're off by exactly the fee amount as that's mined
|
|
|
|
|
# and matures in the next 100 blocks
|
|
|
|
|
node.sendfrom("", common_address, fee)
|
|
|
|
|
accounts = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]
|
|
|
|
|
amount_to_send = 1.0
|
|
|
|
|
account_addresses = dict()
|
|
|
|
|
for account in accounts:
|
|
|
|
@ -56,7 +98,7 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i in range(len(accounts)):
|
|
|
|
|
from_account = accounts[i]
|
|
|
|
|
to_account = accounts[(i+1)%len(accounts)]
|
|
|
|
|
to_account = accounts[(i+1) % len(accounts)]
|
|
|
|
|
to_address = account_addresses[to_account]
|
|
|
|
|
node.sendfrom(from_account, to_address, amount_to_send)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -67,7 +109,7 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
|
|
|
assert(address != account_addresses[account])
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(node.getreceivedbyaccount(account), 2)
|
|
|
|
|
node.move(account, "", node.getbalance(account))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node.generate(101)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected_account_balances = {"": 5200}
|
|
|
|
@ -97,4 +139,4 @@ class WalletAccountsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(node.getbalance(account), 50)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
|
|
|
WalletAccountsTest().main ()
|
|
|
|
|
WalletAccountsTest().main()
|
|
|
|
|