Add comments to descriptor tests

pull/643/head
Pieter Wuille 6 years ago
parent 82df4c64ff
commit 26879509f1

@ -79,20 +79,34 @@ void Check(const std::string& prv, const std::string& pub, int flags, const std:
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(parse_pub->IsRange(), (flags & RANGE) != 0);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(parse_priv->IsRange(), (flags & RANGE) != 0);
// Is not ranged descriptor, only a single result is expected.
// * For ranged descriptors, the `scripts` parameter is a list of expected result outputs, for subsequent
// positions to evaluate the descriptors on (so the first element of `scripts` is for evaluating the
// descriptor at 0; the second at 1; and so on). To verify this, we evaluate the descriptors once for
// each element in `scripts`.
// * For non-ranged descriptors, we evaluate the descriptors at positions 0, 1, and 2, but expect the
// same result in each case, namely the first element of `scripts`. Because of that, the size of
// `scripts` must be one in that case.
if (!(flags & RANGE)) assert(scripts.size() == 1);
size_t max = (flags & RANGE) ? scripts.size() : 3;
// Iterate over the position we'll evaluate the descriptors in.
for (size_t i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
// Call the expected result scripts `ref`.
const auto& ref = scripts[(flags & RANGE) ? i : 0];
// When t=0, evaluate the `prv` descriptor; when t=1, evaluate the `pub` descriptor.
for (int t = 0; t < 2; ++t) {
// When the descriptor is hardened, evaluate with access to the private keys inside.
const FlatSigningProvider& key_provider = (flags & HARDENED) ? keys_priv : keys_pub;
// Evaluate the descriptor selected by `t` in poisition `i`.
FlatSigningProvider script_provider, script_provider_cached;
std::vector<CScript> spks, spks_cached;
std::vector<unsigned char> cache;
BOOST_CHECK((t ? parse_priv : parse_pub)->Expand(i, key_provider, spks, script_provider, &cache));
// Compare the output with the expected result.
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(spks.size(), ref.size());
// Try to expand again using cached data, and compare.
BOOST_CHECK(parse_pub->ExpandFromCache(i, cache, spks_cached, script_provider_cached));
BOOST_CHECK(spks == spks_cached);
@ -100,7 +114,7 @@ void Check(const std::string& prv, const std::string& pub, int flags, const std:
BOOST_CHECK(script_provider.scripts == script_provider_cached.scripts);
BOOST_CHECK(script_provider.origins == script_provider_cached.origins);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(spks.size(), ref.size());
// For each of the produced scripts, verify solvability, and when possible, try to sign a transaction spending it.
for (size_t n = 0; n < spks.size(); ++n) {
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ref[n], HexStr(spks[n].begin(), spks[n].end()));
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(IsSolvable(Merge(key_provider, script_provider), spks[n]), (flags & UNSOLVABLE) == 0);
@ -132,6 +146,7 @@ void Check(const std::string& prv, const std::string& pub, int flags, const std:
}
}
}
// Verify no expected paths remain that were not observed.
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE(left_paths.empty(), "Not all expected key paths found: " + prv);
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save