Merge #17437: rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions

a5e77959c8 rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  Closes #17296.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK a5e77959c8 -- diff looks correct now (good catch @theStack!)
  theStack:
    ACK a5e77959c8
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK a5e77959c8. Changes since last review getblockhash python test fixes, and removing the last hardcoded height

Tree-SHA512: 57dcd0e4e7083f34016bf9cf8ef578fbfde49e882b6cd8623dd1c64716e096e62f6177a4c2ed94f5de304e751fe23fb9d11cf107a86fbf0a3c5f539cd2844916
pull/764/head
MarcoFalke 5 years ago
commit 1028882eea
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: D2EA4850E7528B25

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
Low-level RPC Changes
===
- The RPC gettransaction, listtransactions and listsinceblock responses now also
includes the height of the block that contains the wallet transaction, if any.

@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static void WalletTxToJSON(interfaces::Chain& chain, interfaces::Chain::Lock& lo
if (confirms > 0)
{
entry.pushKV("blockhash", wtx.m_confirm.hashBlock.GetHex());
entry.pushKV("blockheight", wtx.m_confirm.block_height);
entry.pushKV("blockindex", wtx.m_confirm.nIndex);
int64_t block_time;
bool found_block = chain.findBlock(wtx.m_confirm.hashBlock, nullptr /* block */, &block_time);
@ -1367,6 +1368,7 @@ static const std::string TransactionDescriptionString()
" \"generated\": xxx, (bool) Only present if transaction only input is a coinbase one.\n"
" \"trusted\": xxx, (bool) Only present if we consider transaction to be trusted and so safe to spend from.\n"
" \"blockhash\": \"hashvalue\", (string) The block hash containing the transaction.\n"
" \"blockheight\": n, (numeric) The block height containing the transaction.\n"
" \"blockindex\": n, (numeric) The index of the transaction in the block that includes it.\n"
" \"blocktime\": xxx, (numeric) The block time in seconds since epoch (1 Jan 1970 GMT).\n"
" \"txid\": \"transactionid\", (string) The transaction id.\n"

@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def test_no_blockhash(self):
txid = self.nodes[2].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 1)
blockhash, = self.nodes[2].generate(1)
blockheight = self.nodes[2].getblockheader(blockhash)['height']
self.sync_all()
txs = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
"category": "receive",
"amount": 1,
"blockhash": blockhash,
"blockheight": blockheight,
"confirmations": 1,
})
assert_equal(
@ -276,7 +278,8 @@ class ListSinceBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.sync_all()
# gettransaction should work for txid1
self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)
tx1 = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)
assert_equal(tx1['blockheight'], self.nodes[0].getblockheader(tx1['blockhash'])['height'])
# listsinceblock(lastblockhash) should now include txid1 in transactions
# as well as in removed

@ -40,14 +40,15 @@ class ListTransactionsTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
{"txid": txid},
{"category": "receive", "amount": Decimal("0.1"), "confirmations": 0})
# mine a block, confirmations should change:
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
blockhash = self.nodes[0].generate(1)[0]
blockheight = self.nodes[0].getblockheader(blockhash)['height']
self.sync_all()
assert_array_result(self.nodes[0].listtransactions(),
{"txid": txid},
{"category": "send", "amount": Decimal("-0.1"), "confirmations": 1})
{"category": "send", "amount": Decimal("-0.1"), "confirmations": 1, "blockhash": blockhash, "blockheight": blockheight})
assert_array_result(self.nodes[1].listtransactions(),
{"txid": txid},
{"category": "receive", "amount": Decimal("0.1"), "confirmations": 1})
{"category": "receive", "amount": Decimal("0.1"), "confirmations": 1, "blockhash": blockhash, "blockheight": blockheight})
# send-to-self:
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), 0.2)

Loading…
Cancel
Save