of the major CPU users during snippet verification. The class was not
efficient for two reasons:
- it used a too complex input stream; generated from sources and UTF8
byte-conversions. The BufferedReader applied a strong overhead.
- to feed data into the SentenceReader, multiple toString/getBytes had
been applied until a buffered Reader from an input stream was possible.
These superfluous conversions had been removed.
- the best source for the Sentence Reader is a String. Therefore the
production of Strings had been forced inside the Document class.
A limit was necessary because some web pages have such huge numbers of
links that it can easily cause a OOM just by the number of links.
The quesion if the number of 1000 links is sufficient or too weak must
be answered with the result of testing this feature.
the segments had been there to create a tenant-infrastructure but were
never be used since that was all much too complex. There will be a
replacement using a solr navigation using a segment field in the search
index.
- added log warnings in case that search processes run into time-out
situations
- better concurrency for Integer formatter (used a non-synchronized
formatter before)
- bugfix for search termination (a poison pill was missing)
- added timeout parameters for search (again) -> target is, that they
are never reached.
See
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentLinkedQueue.html
and the following test programm:
public class QueueLengthTimeTest {
public static long countTest(Queue<Integer> q, int c) {
long t = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int i = 0; i < c; i++) {
q.add(q.size());
}
return System.currentTimeMillis() - t;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int c = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
Runtime.getRuntime().gc();
long t1 = countTest(new ArrayBlockingQueue<Integer>(c), c);
Runtime.getRuntime().gc();
long t2 = countTest(new LinkedBlockingQueue<Integer>(), c);
Runtime.getRuntime().gc();
long t3 = countTest(new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Integer>(),
c);
System.out.println("count = " + c + ": ArrayBlockingQueue =
" + t1 + ", LinkedBlockingQueue = " + t2 + ", ConcurrentLinkedQueue = "
+ t3);
c = c * 2;
}
}
}
Hashtable is an obsolete collection v1, now since v2 offers HashMap with same or better
functionality. Please review, almost all code was already moved, so only a few changes. That is not the issue,
but I found notices that some (ugly big) helper classes had to be created in past
to compensate missing Hashtable's functionality. I'd like input if we can remove some of them.
look for //FIX: if these commits
Signed-off-by: Marek Otahal <markotahal@gmail.com>
- config string for chinese
- do not copy the language file to DATA/LOCALE any more (and do not use
them there, this is really confusing for new translators)
- show active/running crawls
- execute crawls (works currently only if API entry is available)
- various smaller fixes
git-svn-id: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/yacy/trunk@8056 6c8d7289-2bf4-0310-a012-ef5d649a1542
- some tuning for the autotagger (still not perfect)
- /api/ymarks/get_metadata.xml now provides info for crawlstarts
- removed unused code
git-svn-id: https://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/yacy/trunk@8036 6c8d7289-2bf4-0310-a012-ef5d649a1542