reduced solr cache sizes to check if that solves memory problems a bit

pull/1/head
orbiter 13 years ago
parent 6f01542aaa
commit db6863db77

@ -450,8 +450,8 @@
and old cache.
-->
<filterCache class="solr.FastLRUCache"
size="512"
initialSize="512"
size="100"
initialSize="10"
autowarmCount="0"/>
<!-- Query Result Cache
@ -460,9 +460,9 @@
(DocList) based on a query, a sort, and the range of documents
requested.
-->
<queryResultCache class="solr.LRUCache"
size="512"
initialSize="512"
<queryResultCache class="solr.FastLRUCache"
size="100"
initialSize="10"
autowarmCount="0"/>
<!-- Document Cache
@ -471,9 +471,9 @@
document). Since Lucene internal document ids are transient,
this cache will not be autowarmed.
-->
<documentCache class="solr.LRUCache"
size="512"
initialSize="512"
<documentCache class="solr.FastLRUCache"
size="100"
initialSize="10"
autowarmCount="0"/>
<!-- Field Value Cache
@ -482,12 +482,12 @@
by document id. The fieldValueCache is created by default
even if not configured here.
-->
<!--
<fieldValueCache class="solr.FastLRUCache"
size="512"
autowarmCount="128"
size="100"
autowarmCount="0"
showItems="32" />
-->
<!-- Custom Cache

Loading…
Cancel
Save