Don't enable `-Werror` (in the CI) for compilers at least older than
our current release compiler (GCC 10). It provides little-to-no value,
other than turning compiler bugs & false positives into build failures,
and we aren't going to mutate perfectly fine/working code, for the sake
of avoid a warning that shouldn't even exist.
I also do not see the point of playing whack-a-mole and turning off various
warnings/trying to further work around the broken compiler, just to
acheive warningless builds for the sake of warningless builds.
One anecdote from "How SQLite Is Tested":
> Static analysis has found a few bugs in SQLite, but those are the
> exceptions. More bugs have been introduced into SQLite while trying
> to get it to compile without warnings than have been found by static
> analysis.
https://www.sqlite.org/testing.html.
DOCKER in names is confusingly used as synonym for "image", "container",
and "ci". Fix the confusion by picking the term that fits the context.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { sed -i "s:$1:$2:g" $( git grep -l "$1" ) ; }
ren DOCKER_PACKAGES CI_BASE_PACKAGES
# This better reflects that they are the common base for all CI
# containers.
ren DOCKER_ID CI_CONTAINER_ID
# This is according to the documentation of "--detach , -d: Run
# container in background and print container ID".
ren DOCKER_NAME_TAG CI_IMAGE_NAME_TAG
# This avoids confusing with CONTAINER_NAME and clarifies that it is an
# image.
ren DOCKER_ADMIN CI_CONTAINER_CAP
# This clarifies that it is a capability added to the container.
ren DOCKER_CI_CMD_PREFIX CI_EXEC_CMD_PREFIX
# This brings it in line with the CI_EXEC naming.
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
An earlier version of #16546 used both --with-boost-process and --enable-external-signer, which was simplified to only use the latter. However I forgot to update CI, so the external signer tests were not run.
MarcoFalke