MarcoFalke
f66e1c793e
Merge #13669 : Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations
...
44bbceeef1
[Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott)
736f941424
[Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott)
157651855f
[Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott)
Pull request description:
There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60 ), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95 ) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48 ), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108 ), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535 ), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129 ), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220 )) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other.
This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149 )
1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey
2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx
2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx
I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there.
Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54 ) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output.
Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
6 years ago