5da96210fc doc: release note for getpeerinfo last_block/last_transaction (Jon Atack)
cfef5a2c98 test: rpc_net.py logging and test naming improvements (Jon Atack)
21c57bacda test: getpeerinfo last_block and last_transaction tests (Jon Atack)
8a560a7d57 rpc: expose nLastBlockTime/TXTime as getpeerinfo last_block/transaction (Jon Atack)
02fbe3ae0b net: add nLastBlockTime/TXTime to CNodeStats, CNode::copyStats (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR adds inbound peer eviction criteria `nLastBlockTime` and `nLastTXTime` to `CNodeStats` and `CNode::copyStats`, which then allows exposing them in the next commit as `last_transaction` and `last_block` Unix Epoch Time fields in RPC `getpeerinfo`.
This may be useful for writing missing eviction tests. I'd also like to add `lasttx` and `lastblk` columns to the `-netinfo` dashboard as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19643#issuecomment-671093420.
Relevant discussion at the p2p irc meeting http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-08-11.html#l-549:
```text
<jonatack> i was specifically trying to observe and figure out how to test https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19500
<jonatack> which made me realise that i didn't know what was going on with my peer conns in enough detail
<jonatack> i'm running bitcoin locally with nLastBlockTime and nLastTXTime added to getpeerinfo for my peer connections dashboard
<jonatack> sipa: is there a good reason why that (eviction criteria) data is not exposed through getpeerinfo currently?
<sipa> jonatack: nope; i suspect just nobody ever added it
<jonatack> sipa: thanks. will propose.
```
The last commit is optional, but I think it would be good to have logging in `rpc_net.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 5da96210fc
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5da96210fc
darosior:
ACK 5da96210fc
Tree-SHA512: 2db164bc979c014837a676e890869a128beb7cf40114853239e7280f57e768bcb43bff6c1ea76a61556212135281863b5290b50ff9d24fce16c5b89b55d4cd70
124e1ee134 doc: Add release notes for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
c447b09458 test: Add tests for getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
667bc7a7f7 rpc: Add getindexinfo RPC (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
As I was playing with indices a I was missing an RPC that gives information about the active indices in the node. I think this can be helpful for many users, especially since there are some new index candidates coming up (#14053, #18000) that can give a quick overview without the user having to parse the logs.
Feature summary:
- Adds new RPC `listindices` (placed in Util section)
- That RPC only lists the actively running indices
- For each index it gives the name, whether it is synced and up to which block height it is synced
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Re-ACK 124e1ee134
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 124e1ee per `git range-diff a57af89 47a5372 124e1ee` no change since my last re-ACK, rebase only
Tree-SHA512: 3b7174c87951e6457fef099f530337803906baf32fb64261410b8def2c0917853d6a1bf3059cd590b1cc1523608f8916dafb327a431d27ecbf8d7454406b5b35
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will
automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically
on startup will be more useful in the GUI when the option to create wallets is
added in #15006, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
01cd24c226 doc: set CC_FOR_BUILD when building on OpenBSD (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Closes: #19559
While #19559 has been fixed upstream, it makes sense to not only
recommend using `CC_FOR_BUILD`here until the fix is pulled in as
part of our next libsecp update, but after discussing with Cory,
he suggested we should be setting this on OpenBSD (which still has
the an ancient GCC) regardless.
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
ACK 01cd24c226 I looked at the diff (but can't test the instructions on OpenBSD)
laanwj:
Code review ACK 01cd24c226
Tree-SHA512: 322802b9303771f1be2ad9628f268dfa71dc7ee77948fa2a34f21eceb19b2d8efdd8876c8f0778adbfcde48fa0f88cd4e698ae425428159abca38e8c7980da1d
1e72b68ab3 Replace `hidden service` with `onion service` (Riccardo Masutti)
Pull request description:
For a couple of years, Tor has made the term `hidden service` obsolete, in favor of `onion service`: [Tor Project | Onion Services](https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/)
This PR updates all the references.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 1e72b68ab3
hebasto:
ACK 1e72b68ab3, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: 6a29e828e1c5e1ec934b5666f67326dbd84d77c8b2641f6740abac6d3d5923b7729763b9ff2230390b0bb23359a5f3731ccd9a30011ca69004f7c820aed17262
For a couple of years, Tor documentation has made
the term hidden service obsolete, in favor of onion
service.
This PR updates all the references in the code base.
70452a070b build: set minimum required Boost to 1.58 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Any systems which only have an older installable Boost can use depends.
1.58.0 retains compatibility with the packages [installable on Ubuntu 16.04](https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/libboost-dev).
The projects usage of Boost wont be going away any time soon, if ever (i.e #15382), and our usage of the test framework.
Fixes: #19506
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 70452a070b -- patch looks correct
laanwj:
ACK 70452a070b
hebasto:
ACK 70452a070b, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: d290415e3c70a394b3d7659c0480a35b4082bdce8d48b1c64a0025f7ad6e21567b4dc85813869513ad246d27f950706930410587c11c1aa3693ae6245084765c
31cf68a3ad [util] add RunCommandParseJSON (Sjors Provoost)
c17f54ee53 [ci] use boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
32128ba682 [doc] include Doxygen comments for HAVE_BOOST_PROCESS (Sjors Provoost)
3c84d85f7d [build] msvc: add boost::process (Sjors Provoost)
c47e4bbf0b [build] make boost-process opt-in (Sjors Provoost)
929cda5470 configure: add ax_boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
8314c23d7b [depends] boost: patch unused variable in boost_process (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Prerequisite for external signer support in #16546. Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This adds a new dependency [boost process](https://github.com/boostorg/process/tree/boost-1.64.0). This is part of Boost since 1.64 which is part of `depends`. Because the minimum Boost version is 1.47, this functionality is skipped for older versions of Boost.
Use `./configure --with-boost-process` to opt in, which checks for the presence of Boost::Process.
We add `UniValue runCommandParseJSON(const std::string& strCommand)` to `system.{h,cpp}` which calls an arbitrary command and processes the JSON returned by it. This is currently only called by the test suite.
~For testing purposes this adds a new regtest-only RPC method `runcommand`, as well as `test/mocks/command.py` used by functional tests.~ (this is no longer the case)
TODO:
- [ ] review boost process in #15440
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 31cf68a3ad
hebasto:
re-ACK 31cf68a3ad, only rebased (verified with `git range-diff`) and removed an unintentional tab character since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15382#pullrequestreview-458371035) review.
meshcollider:
Very light utACK 31cf68a3ad, although I am not very confident with build stuff.
promag:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad, don't mind the nit.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 31cf68a3ad. I left some comments below that could be ignored or followed up later. The current change is clean and comprehensive.
Tree-SHA512: c506e747014b263606e1f538ed4624a8ad7bcf4e025cb700c12cc5739964e254dc04a2bbb848996b170e2ccec3fbfa4fe9e2b3976b191222cfb82fc3e6ab182d
78c312c983 Replace current benchmarking framework with nanobench (Martin Ankerl)
Pull request description:
Replace current benchmarking framework with nanobench
This replaces the current benchmarking framework with nanobench [1], an
MIT licensed single-header benchmarking library, of which I am the
autor. This has in my opinion several advantages, especially on Linux:
* fast: Running all benchmarks takes ~6 seconds instead of 4m13s on
an Intel i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz.
* accurate: I ran e.g. the benchmark for SipHash_32b 10 times and
calculate standard deviation / mean = coefficient of variation:
* 0.57% CV for old benchmarking framework
* 0.20% CV for nanobench
So the benchmark results with nanobench seem to vary less than with
the old framework.
* It automatically determines runtime based on clock precision, no need
to specify number of evaluations.
* measure instructions, cycles, branches, instructions per cycle,
branch misses (only Linux, when performance counters are available)
* output in markdown table format.
* Warn about unstable environment (frequency scaling, turbo, ...)
* For better profiling, it is possible to set the environment variable
NANOBENCH_ENDLESS to force endless running of a particular benchmark
without the need to recompile. This makes it to e.g. run "perf top"
and look at hotspots.
Here is an example copy & pasted from the terminal output:
| ns/byte | byte/s | err% | ins/byte | cyc/byte | IPC | bra/byte | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 2.52 | 396,529,415.94 | 0.6% | 25.42 | 8.02 | 3.169 | 0.06 | 0.0% | 0.03 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp RIPEMD160`
| 1.87 | 535,161,444.83 | 0.3% | 21.36 | 5.95 | 3.589 | 0.06 | 0.0% | 0.02 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA1`
| 3.22 | 310,344,174.79 | 1.1% | 36.80 | 10.22 | 3.601 | 0.09 | 0.0% | 0.04 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256`
| 2.01 | 496,375,796.23 | 0.0% | 18.72 | 6.43 | 2.911 | 0.01 | 1.0% | 0.00 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256D64_1024`
| 7.23 | 138,263,519.35 | 0.1% | 82.66 | 23.11 | 3.577 | 1.63 | 0.1% | 0.00 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256_32b`
| 3.04 | 328,780,166.40 | 0.3% | 35.82 | 9.69 | 3.696 | 0.03 | 0.0% | 0.03 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA512`
[1] https://github.com/martinus/nanobench
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 78c312c983
Tree-SHA512: 9e18770b18b6f95a7d0105a4a5497d31cf4eb5efe6574f4482f6f1b4c88d7e0946b9a4a1e9e8e6ecbf41a3f2d7571240677dcb45af29a6f0584e89b25f32e49e
Closes: #19559
While #19559 has been fixed upstream, it makes sense to not only
recommend using `CC_FOR_BUILD`here until the fix is pulled in as
part of our next libsecp update, but after discussing with Cory,
he suggested we should be setting this on OpenBSD (which still has
the an ancient GCC) regardless.
9c69cfe4c5 Add <datadir>/settings.json persistent settings storage. (Russell Yanofsky)
eb682c5700 util: Add ReadSettings and WriteSettings functions (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Persistent settings are used in followup PRs #15936 to unify gui settings between bitcoin-qt and bitcoind, and #15937 to add a load_on_startup flag to the loadwallet RPC and maintain a dynamic list of wallets that should be loaded on startup that also can be shared between bitcoind and bitcoin-qt.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Approach re-ACK 9c69cfe4c5🌾
jnewbery:
utACK 9c69cfe4c5
Tree-SHA512: 39fcc6051717117c9141e934de1d0d3f739484be4685cdf97d54de967c8c816502b4fd0de12114433beaa5c5b7060c810fd8ae4e2b3ce7c371eb729ac01ba2e1
e80259f197 Additionally treat Tx.nVersion as unsigned in joinpsbts (Matt Corallo)
970de70bdd Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Consensus-wise we already treat it as an unsigned integer (the
only rules around it are in CSV/locktime handling), but changing
the underlying data type means touching consensus code for a
simple cleanup change, which isn't really worth it.
See-also, https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/299
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK e80259f197
practicalswift:
ACK e80259f197
ajtowns:
ACK e80259f197 code review -- checked all other uses of tx.nVersion treat it as unsigned (except for policy.cpp:IsStandard anyway), so looks good.
naumenkogs:
ACK e80259f
Tree-SHA512: 6760a2c77e24e9e1f79a336ca925f9bbca3a827ce02003c71d7f214b82ed3dea13fa7d9f87df9b9445cd58dff8b44a15571d821c876f22f8e5a372a014c9976b
08fc6f6cfc [rpc] refactor: consolidate sendmany and sendtoaddress code (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I consolidated code between these two RPC calls, since `sendtoaddress` is essentially `sendmany` with 1 destination.
Unless I overlooked something, the only behaviour change is that some `sendtoaddress` error codes changed from `-4` to `-6`. The release note mentions this.
Salvaged from #18201.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 08fc6f6cfc
jonatack:
ACK 08fc6f6cfc
meshcollider:
Code review & functional test run ACK 08fc6f6cfc
Tree-SHA512: 7b66c52fa0444a4d02fc3f81d9c2a386794d447616026a30111eda35fb46510475eea6506a9ceda00bb4e0230ebb758da5d236b3ac05c954c044fa68a1e3e909
Persistent settings are used in followup PRs #15936 to unify gui settings
between bitcoin-qt and bitcoind, and #15937 to add a load_on_startup flag to
the loadwallet RPC and maintain a dynamic list of wallets that should be loaded
on startup that also can be shared between bitcoind and bitcoin-qt.
fab5586122 doc: Use precise permission flags where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of mentioning the all-encompassing `-whitelist*` settings, change the docs to mention the exact permission flag that will influence the behaviour.
This is needed because in the future, the too-broad `-whitelist*` settings (they either include *all* permission flags or apply to *all* peers) might be deprecated to require the permission flags to be enumerated.
Alternatively, in the future there could be an RPC to set the net permission flags on an existing connection, in which case the `-whitelist*` terminology is of no help.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK fab5586122
fjahr:
Code review ACK fab5586122
jonatack:
ACK fab5586122
Tree-SHA512: c7dea3e577d90103bb2b0ffab7b7c8640b388932a3a880f69e2b70747fc9213dc1f437085671fd54c902ec2a578458b8a2fae6dbe076642fb88efbf9fa9e679c
41d55d3057 doc: getpeerinfo banscore deprecation release note (Jon Atack)
dd54e3796e test: getpeerinfo banscore deprecation test (Jon Atack)
8c7647b3fb rpc: deprecate banscore field in rpc getpeerinfo (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Per https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19219#discussion_r443074487 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19219#issuecomment-652699592, this PR deprecates returning the `banscore` field in the `getpeerinfo` RPC, updates the help, adds a test, and updates the release notes. Related to #19464.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 41d55d3057
Tree-SHA512: 8eca08332581e2fe191a2aafff6ba89ce39413f0491ed0de8b86577739f0ec430b1a8fbff2914b0f3138a229563dfcc1981c0cf5b7dd6061b5c48680a28423bc
a4a3fc4cd2 doc: improve subtree check instructions (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Running `git-subtree-check.sh` requires adding the subtree repository as a remote. I learned that several years ago and then forgot again.
This PR also improves the error message if the subtree commit can't be found.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a4a3fc4cd2
fanquake:
ACK a4a3fc4cd2 - this looks ok.
Tree-SHA512: 959bd923726c172d17f9f97f8a56988bf2df5a94d3131e5152a66150b941394cee9e82fdc6b86e09c0ba91d123a496599f07ca454212168d8d301738394c12c8
fa0540cd46 net: Extract download permission from noban (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It should be possible to grant nodes in a local network (e.g. home, university, enterprise, ...) permission to download blocks even after the maxuploadtarget is hit.
Currently this is only possible by setting the `noban` permission, which has some adverse effects, especially if the peers can't be fully trusted.
Fix this by extracting a `download` permission from `noban`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa0540c
Sjors:
re-utACK fa0540cd46
Tree-SHA512: 255566baa43ae925d93f5d0a3aa66b475a556d1590f662a88278a4872f16a1a05739a6119ae48a293011868042e05cb264cffe5822a50fb80db7333bf44376d9
2b78a11b48 doc: afl fuzzing comment about afl-gcc and afl-g++ (nsa)
Pull request description:
When trying to build the fuzz tests with `--enable-lcov` on a Ubuntu machine, noticed that the documentation was lacking with regards to the afl-gcc and afl-g++ options. `afl-clang-fast` and `afl-clang-fast++` in the examples just need to be replaced with `afl-gcc` and `afl-g++`. I also had to set the `-m` flag as well to get the fuzzers to run.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 2b78a11b48
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK 2b78a11b48, haven't tested
Tree-SHA512: d8151afd79de949e8c6da49b69bbbf1470eb478c8ddcbc69b30e86bf9396c0f13835a655d4ae658f7dc4f36c35b02cd23b08358fb73a71e15bf14e76c1f365a4
This commit includes a short comment in doc/fuzzing.md that gives
guidance on compiling Bitcoin Core with AFL instrumentation using
afl-gcc and afl-g++.
This patch improves performance and resource usage around IP
addresses that are banned for misbehavior. They're already not
actually banned, as connections from them are still allowed,
but they are preferred for eviction if the inbound connection
slots are full.
Stop treating these like manually banned IP ranges, and instead
just keep them in a rolling Bloom filter of misbehaving nodes,
which isn't persisted to disk or exposed through the ban
framework. The effect remains the same: preferred for eviction,
avoided for outgoing connections, and not relayed to other peers.
Also change the name of this mechanism to better reflect reality;
they're not banned, just discouraged.
Contains release notes and several interface improvements by
John Newbery.
21a65756f5 Add Windows WSL build recommendation to temporarily disable Win32 PE support. (Aaron Clauson)
Pull request description:
This is a solution for the issues described in #17277 and #18348
When cross compiling Bitcoin Code for Windows the `Autoconf` configure scripts attempt to execute Win32 PE files. The configure scripts expect the attempt to fail, however, WSL supports forking the execution of Win32 PE files out to the underlying Windows OS. This can result in the executions failing for unanticipated reasons, which is the case in the two referenced issues.
This PR adds an explanatory note and additional instructions to temporarily disable WLS's Win32 support.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 21a65756f5
Tree-SHA512: afb014be5a63fa9a827aed30acb2faab15feed34ed89c788a7f6ae6ab1b2238f99e075e6e281d0cc581914db3a4ecc3d5a3d26442f11a520e4e457a40e75e533
6d35d0d18f doc: add release note for -getinfo displaying multiwallet balances (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Release note for #18594. This is one of the commits from #19089, which had one concept ACK and approach ACK since late May. It seems better to submit the changes atomically.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 38616d14b02c39f4ee4b93bf14f72043423cef177b595e85181bc9dc610fbe19d8271f2d2c9e5e17bb46423ffe27746e8e510b13a23ae6fd0e5bc4418a00dafa
25dac9fa65 doc: add release notes for explicit fee estimators and bumpfee change (Karl-Johan Alm)
05227a3554 tests for bumpfee / estimate_modes (Karl-Johan Alm)
3404c1b753 policy: optional FeeEstimateMode param to CFeeRate::ToString (Karl-Johan Alm)
6fcf448430 rpc/wallet: add two explicit modes to estimate_mode (Karl-Johan Alm)
b188d80c2d MOVEONLY: Make FeeEstimateMode available to CFeeRate (Karl-Johan Alm)
5d1a411eb1 fees: add FeeModes doc helper function (Karl-Johan Alm)
91f6d2bc8f rpc/wallet: add conf_target as alias to confTarget in bumpfee (Karl-Johan Alm)
69158b41fc added CURRENCY_ATOM to express minimum indivisible unit (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This lets users pick their own fees when using `sendtoaddress`/`sendmany` if they prefer this over the estimators.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 25dac9fa65: rebased, more fancy C++,
jonatack:
ACK 25dac9fa65 I think this should be merged after all this time, even though it looks to me like there are needed follow-ups, fixes and test coverage to be added (see further down), which I don't mind helping out with, if wanted.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 25dac9fa65
Tree-SHA512: f31177e6cabf3187a43cdfe93477144f8e8385c7344613743cbbd16e8490d53ff5144aec7b9de6c9a65eb855b55e0f99d7f164dee4b6bf3cfea4dce51cf11d33
f1d21ef1c3 doc: add C++17 release note for 0.21.0 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
TLDR: Mention that the codebase is now compatible with C++17, and that the
intention is to require C++17 starting with 0.22.0.
Following some discussion with Cory/Carl, and in #16684, I think this is the next step in the C++17 migration.
While #16684 mentions a gitian/Guix release with C++17, it's not yet clear how that would be done. Are we just going to pass `--enable-c++17` in gitian/Guix?. Are we changing our default in configure.ac?
According to the [last comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16684#issuecomment-643778757) in #16684, we wouldn't be changing anything in depends:
> No, everything (including depends) will stay at C++11.
However I don't think we want to be mixing C++11 built dependencies, with a C++17 built bitcoind, if there is any potential for compatibility issues.
Instead, I'd suggest we build the 0.21.0 release as C++11, and do a complete switch to C++17 for 0.22.0. Also, if we actually wanted to use C++17 in depends for 0.21.0, we couldn't without breaking C++11 compat (Qt). See below.
Here is a potential timeline/TODOs for the migration:
Potential Timeline
* 17 / 6 / 2020 - Today
* Some time prior to split-off:
* Confirm that compiling with C++17 works.
* Confirm that C++11 compatibility has not been broken.
* 1 / 11 / 2020
* [0.21.0 split off happens](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18947).
* 2 / 11 / 2020
* Merge an "incompatible with C++11" change into master.
* Switch configure to use C++17 mode by default.
* Update minimum compiler requirements. At least:
* Clang 5: https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html#cxx17
* GCC 7: https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx17
* While GCC has some support from 5, it seems a more complete support landed in GCC 7.
* https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html#cxx
* Switch depends packages to use C++17 where applicable.
* Bump Qt from 5.9.x (no c++17 mode) to, likely, 5.15.x (LTS).
* Drop support for macOS < 10.14.x
* The c++ dylib shipped with macOS [doesn't support c++17, prior to macOS 10.14](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16684#issuecomment-643722538).
* Building Qt 5.12 or 5.15 in C++17 mode will also require a minimum macOS deployment target of 10.14. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/283832.
* Begin merging PRs like #19183 and #19245.
* I've left some comments in #19183 if the macOS runtime issue interests anyone.
* 3 / 12 / 2020
* 0.21.0 released.
* Built as C++11.
* Contains warning in release notes that compiling 0.22.0 will require C++17.
* 3 / 6 / 2021
* 0.22.0 released.
* Full of C++17 code.
One thing worth noting, is that we cannot bump our Qt to a newer LTS for 0.21.0, without breaking C++11 compatibility. Qt 5.12 is not compilable in C++11 mode, as the project has started using C++14 features throughout at least the macOS portions of it's codebase, and seemingly "forgotten" that the release is meant to be C++11 compatible.
Upstream bug here: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-77310.
> Building Qt requires C+11, at a minimum, but in practice we use later features, usually under a feature define, or with a fallback of some kind. On platforms that support > C11, we've (apparently) not considered the fallback necessary, under the assumption C+14 is always available.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f1d21ef1c3 can't hurt to give an advance warning
Sjors:
ACK f1d21ef1c3
laanwj:
ACK f1d21ef1c3
theStack:
ACK f1d21ef1c3
Tree-SHA512: 706baceb07d9584783ba6e437cdf447531c20f586285b9797edc21f3adb1e9d386059d1c543c70eb298d0f8e555dafb6682a55d35c5836979fc12132e8ba06f5
bc01f7ae05 doc: release note for rpc getaddressinfo removals (Jon Atack)
90e989390e rpc: getaddressinfo RPCResult fixup (Jon Atack)
a8507c99da rpc: remove deprecated getaddressinfo `labels: purpose` (Jon Atack)
645a8653c8 rpc: remove deprecated getaddressinfo `label` field (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
These were deprecated in #17578 and #17585, with expected 0.21 removal notified in the 0.20 release notes.
```
- The `getaddressinfo` RPC has had its `label` field deprecated
(re-enable for this release using the configuration parameter
`-deprecatedrpc=label`). The `labels` field is altered from returning
JSON objects to returning a JSON array of label names (re-enable
previous behavior for this release using the configuration parameter
`-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`). Backwards compatibility using the
deprecated configuration parameters is expected to be dropped in the
0.21 release. (#17585, #17578)
```
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK bc01f7a
adamjonas:
utACK bc01f7a
meshcollider:
utACK bc01f7ae05
Tree-SHA512: ae1af381e32c4c3bde8b061a56382838513a9a82c88767843cdeae3a2ab8aa7d8c2e66e106d2b31ea07d74bb80c191a2f842c9aaecc7c5438ad9a9bc66d1b251
e5327f947c [rpc] fundrawtransaction: add_inputs option to control automatic input adding (Sjors Provoost)
79804fe24b [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: don't automatically append inputs (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, `walletcreatefundedpsbt` now fails if the amount is insufficient, unless `addInputs` is set to `true`.
Similarly for `fundrawtransaction` if the original transaction already specified inputs, we only add more if `addInputs` is set to `true`.
This protects against fat finger mistakes in the amount or fee rate (see also #16257). The behavior is also more similar to GUI coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5327f947c
meshcollider:
utACK e5327f947c
Tree-SHA512: d8653b820914396c7c25b0d0a2b7e92de214aa023bc1aa085feb37d3b20fab361ebea90416a7db989f19bdc37e26cf0adfbcb712c80985c87afa67a9bd44fecb
Wladimir J. van der Laan