01174596e6 signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript param (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adding support for "witnessScript" as an alternative to "redeemScript" when using "signrawtransactionwithkey" meant that the `RPCTypeCheckObj()` call in `SignTransaction` can't error out just because either parameter is missing -- it's only a problem if both are missing, which isn't a state `RPCTypeCheckObj()` tests for. This results in the regression described in #16249. This patch adds some code to test for this case and give a similar error, namely:
error code: -8
error message:
Missing redeemScript/witnessScript
Fixes: #16249
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 01174596e6
promag:
ACK 01174596e. Could also write test without `dict`/`del`:
Tree-SHA512: cf51346b7dea551b7f18f2a93c2a336a293b2535c62c03a5263cd2be8c58cf0cc302891da659c167e88ad1a68a756472c3c07e99f71627c61d32886fc5a3a353
Instead of creating a redeemScript with CreateMultisigRedeemscript and
then getting the destination with AddAndGetDestinationForScript, do
both in the same function.
CreateMultisigRedeemscript is changed to AddAndGetMultisigDestination.
It creates the redeemScript and returns it via an output parameter. Then
it calls AddAndGetDestinationForScript to add the destination to the
keystore and get the proper destination.
This allows us to inspect the public keys in the redeemScript before creating
the destination so that the correct destination is used when uncompressed
pubkeys are in the multisig.
MarcoFalke