Mostly changes to remove src/univalue exceptions from the various linters,
and the required code changes to make them happy. As well as minor doc
changes.
ce893c0497 doc: Update developer notes (Anthony Towns)
d2852917ee sync.h: Imply negative assertions when calling LOCK (Anthony Towns)
bba87c0553 scripted-diff: Convert global Mutexes to GlobalMutexes (Anthony Towns)
a559509a0b sync.h: Add GlobalMutex type (Anthony Towns)
be6aa72f9f qt/clientmodel: thread safety annotation for m_cached_tip_mutex (Anthony Towns)
f24bd45b37 net_processing: thread safety annotation for m_tx_relay_mutex (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This changes `LOCK(mutex)` for non-global, non-recursive mutexes to be annotated with the negative capability for the mutex it refers to, to prevent . clang applies negative capabilities recursively, so this helps avoid forgetting to annotate functions.
This can't reasonably be used for globals, because clang would require every function to be annotated with `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!g_mutex)` for each global mutex; so this introduces a trivial `GlobalMutex` subclass of `Mutex`, and reduces the annotations for both `GlobalMutex` to `LOCKS_EXCLUDED` which only catches trivial errors (eg (`LOCK(x); LOCK(x);`).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ce893c0497🐦
hebasto:
ACK ce893c0497
Tree-SHA512: 5c35e8c7677ce3d994a7e3774f4344adad496223a51b3a1d1d3b5f20684b2e1d5cff688eb3fbc8d33e1b9940dfa76e515f9434e21de6f3ce3c935e29a319f529
that was added in 2015 by commit b8c06ef40 in PR 7003, as that potential issue
would now be caught by the test/lint/lint-format-strings.py script run by the CI
52a797bfe5 doc: Avoid ADL for function calls (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It happened two times recently, when [ADL](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl) popped up unexpectedly and brought some confusion:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24338/files#r805989994
> Any idea why this even compiles?
- https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2022-02-18.html#l-51:
> 2022-02-18T03:24:14 \<dongcarl\> Does anyone know why this compiles? 6d3d2caa37
> 2022-02-18T03:24:14 \<dongcarl\> GetUTXOStatsWithHasher and MakeUTXOHasher are both in the `kernel::` namespace and I never added a `using` declaration on top...
> 2022-02-18T03:25:53 \<sipa\> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/adl ?
Let's document our intention to avoid similar cases in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Anyhow, ACK 52a797bfe5, there is no need to hold merge up on this, documenting it is a step forward.
Tree-SHA512: f52688b5d8f6130302185206ec6ea4731b099a75294ea2d477901a52d6d58473e3427e658aea408c140c2824c37a0399ec7376aded2a91197895ea52d51f0018
0bc666b053 doc: add info for debugging with relative paths (S3RK)
a8b515c317 configure: keep relative paths in debug info (S3RK)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up for #20353 that fixes#21885
It also adds a small section to assist debugging without absolute paths in debug info.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Tested ACK 0bc666b053
Zero-1729:
Light crACK 0bc666b053
Tree-SHA512: d4b75183c3d3a0f59fe786841fb230581de87f6fe04cf7224e4b89c520d45513ba729d4ad8c0e62dd1dbaaa7a25741f04d036bc047f92842e76c9cc31ea47fb2
05f9770c1f doc: Clarify developer notes about constant naming (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
I'm pretty sure developer notes were intended to say constants should be upper case and variables should be lower case, but right now they are ambiguous about whether to write:
```c++
extern const int SYMBOL;
```
or:
```c++
extern const int g_symbol;
```
First convention above is better than the second convention because it tells you without having to look anything up that the value of `SYMBOL` won't change at runtime. Also I haven't seen other c++ projects using the second convention.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 05f9770c1f
practicalswift:
ACK 05f9770c1f
jarolrod:
ACK 05f9770c1f🥃
Tree-SHA512: 766d0e25d9db818d45df4ad6386987014f2053584cbced4b755ceef8bda6b7e2cfeb34eb8516423bd03b140faaf577614d5e3be2799f7eed0eb439187ab85323
Since the flag has been removed from the RPC command table in commit
ec6902d0ea (PR #11179), this guideline
is not relevant anymore and can be removed.
a4a3fc4cd2 doc: improve subtree check instructions (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Running `git-subtree-check.sh` requires adding the subtree repository as a remote. I learned that several years ago and then forgot again.
This PR also improves the error message if the subtree commit can't be found.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a4a3fc4cd2
fanquake:
ACK a4a3fc4cd2 - this looks ok.
Tree-SHA512: 959bd923726c172d17f9f97f8a56988bf2df5a94d3131e5152a66150b941394cee9e82fdc6b86e09c0ba91d123a496599f07ca454212168d8d301738394c12c8
I'm pretty sure developer notes were intended to say constants should be upper
case and variables should be lower case, but right now they are ambiguous about
whether to write:
```c++
// foo.h
extern const int SYMBOL;
// foo.cpp
const int SYMBOL = 1;
```
or:
```c++
// foo.h
extern const int g_symbol;
// foo.cpp
const int g_symbol = 1;
```
First convention above is better than the second convention because it tells
you without having to look anything up that the value of `SYMBOL` will never
change at runtime. Also I've never seen any c++ project anywhere using the
second convention
3e32499909 Change example addresses to bech32 (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #18197 that fixes RPCExamples.
Fixes#18185.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3e32499909
jonatack:
ACK 3e32499
Tree-SHA512: c7a6410ef8b6e169016c2c5eac3e6b9501caabd0e8a0871ec31e56bfc44589f056d3f5cb55b5a13bba36f6c15136c2352f883e30e4dcc0997ffd36b27f9173b9
155a11f897 doc: Added running functional tests in valgrind (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
Technically the notes only show an "example" of how to run valgrind with the suppression file,
but now that https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17633 is merged then maybe this can encourage more people to run also the functional tests in valgrind
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b8417249b720d0ed5e10b732648f2e07e8889bfc7aa7e94192d1c049b4b7837971678d30c535f273c227848f1290cf11e14369fd6c1924b734f2e47e2af41401
also contains the following changes:
- rpc: factor out example bech32 address for RPCExamples
- doc: update developer notes wrt RPCExamples addresses
(mention the EXAMPLE_ADDRESS constant as an example for an invalid bech32
address suitable for RPCExamples help documentation)
42ec499489 doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
the use of bech32 addresses by default. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r361752570 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r362564492.
Fix a typo to appease the linter.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 42ec499489, no strong opinion as whether this belongs to developer notes or not but why not.
fjahr:
ACK 42ec499
michaelfolkson:
ACK 42ec499489
Tree-SHA512: 64f90e227d256aa194c4fd48435440bdc233a51213dd4a6ac5b05d04263f729c6b4bb5f3afd3b87719b20cb1b159d5a9673d58a11b72823a4a6a16e8a26ae10e
Vasil Dimov