4 Commits (9ca39d69dfe03c19662867c3d53a5e6e41277d4a)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
kouloumos	cc434cbf58	wallet: fix sendall creates tx that fails tx-size check ... The `sendall` RPC doesn't use `CreateTransactionInternal`as the rest of the wallet RPCs and it never checks against the tx-size mempool limit. Add a check for tx-size as well as test coverage for that case.	2 years ago
ishaanam	6f8e3818af	sendall: check if the maxtxfee has been exceeded	2 years ago
ishaanam	bb84b7145b	add tests for no recipient and using send_max while inputs are specified	3 years ago
Murch	49090ec402	Add sendall RPC née sweep ... _Motivation_ Currently, the wallet uses a fSubtractFeeAmount (SFFO) flag on the recipients objects for all forms of sending calls. According to the commit discussion, this flag was chiefly introduced to permit sweeping without manually calculating the fees of transactions. However, the flag leads to unintuitive behavior and makes it more complicated to test many wallet RPCs exhaustively. We proposed to introduce a dedicated `sendall` RPC with the intention to cover this functionality. Since the proposal, it was discovered in further discussion that our proposed `sendall` rpc and SFFO have subtly different scopes of operation. • sendall: Use _specific UTXOs_ to pay a destination the remainder after fees. • SFFO: Use a _specific budget_ to pay an address the remainder after fees. While `sendall` will simplify cases of spending from specific UTXOs, emptying a wallet, or burning dust, we realized that there are some cases in which SFFO is used to pay other parties from a limited budget, which can often lead to the creation of change outputs. This cannot be easily replicated using `sendall` as it would require manual computation of the appropriate change amount. As such, sendall cannot replace all uses of SFFO, but it still has a different use case and will aid in simplifying some wallet calls and numerous wallet tests. _Sendall call details_ The proposed sendall call builds a transaction from a specific subset of the wallet's UTXO pool (by default all of them) and assigns the funds to one or more receivers. Receivers can either be specified with a specific amount or receive an equal share of the remaining unassigned funds. At least one recipient must be provided without assigned amount to collect the remainder. The `sendall` call will never create change. The call has a `send_max` option that changes the default behavior of spending all UTXOs ("no UTXO left behind"), to maximizing the output amount of the transaction by skipping uneconomic UTXOs. The `send_max` option is incompatible with providing a specific set of inputs.	3 years ago