|
|
|
@ -42,6 +42,51 @@ static NodeId id = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(DoS_tests, TestingSetup)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test eviction of an outbound peer whose chain never advances
|
|
|
|
|
// Mock a node connection, and use mocktime to simulate a peer
|
|
|
|
|
// which never sends any headers messages. PeerLogic should
|
|
|
|
|
// decide to evict that outbound peer, after the appropriate timeouts.
|
|
|
|
|
// Note that we protect 4 outbound nodes from being subject to
|
|
|
|
|
// this logic; this test takes advantage of that protection only
|
|
|
|
|
// being applied to nodes which send headers with sufficient
|
|
|
|
|
// work.
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(outbound_slow_chain_eviction)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mock an outbound peer
|
|
|
|
|
CAddress addr1(ip(0xa0b0c001), NODE_NONE);
|
|
|
|
|
CNode dummyNode1(id++, ServiceFlags(NODE_NETWORK|NODE_WITNESS), 0, INVALID_SOCKET, addr1, 0, 0, CAddress(), "", /*fInboundIn=*/ false);
|
|
|
|
|
dummyNode1.SetSendVersion(PROTOCOL_VERSION);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->InitializeNode(&dummyNode1);
|
|
|
|
|
dummyNode1.nVersion = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
dummyNode1.fSuccessfullyConnected = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This test requires that we have a chain with non-zero work.
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip() != nullptr);
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test starts here
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
dummyNode1.vSendMsg.clear();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int64_t nStartTime = GetTime();
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait 21 minutes
|
|
|
|
|
SetMockTime(nStartTime+21*60);
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in getheaders
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.vSendMsg.size() > 0);
|
|
|
|
|
// Wait 3 more minutes
|
|
|
|
|
SetMockTime(nStartTime+24*60);
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy); // should result in disconnect
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(dummyNode1.fDisconnect == true);
|
|
|
|
|
SetMockTime(0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool dummy;
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
std::atomic<bool> interruptDummy(false);
|
|
|
|
@ -71,6 +116,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banning)
|
|
|
|
|
Misbehaving(dummyNode2.GetId(), 50);
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode2, interruptDummy);
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr2));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool dummy;
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode2.GetId(), dummy);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
|
|
|
|
@ -95,6 +144,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_banscore)
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->SendMessages(&dummyNode1, interruptDummy);
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(connman->IsBanned(addr1));
|
|
|
|
|
gArgs.ForceSetArg("-banscore", std::to_string(DEFAULT_BANSCORE_THRESHOLD));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool dummy;
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode1.GetId(), dummy);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
|
|
|
|
@ -121,6 +173,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(DoS_bantime)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SetMockTime(nStartTime+60*60*24+1);
|
|
|
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(!connman->IsBanned(addr));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool dummy;
|
|
|
|
|
peerLogic->FinalizeNode(dummyNode.GetId(), dummy);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTransactionRef RandomOrphan()
|
|
|
|
|