[Refactor] Rename scriptPubKey -> exec_script

Rename misleading scriptPubKey in ExecuteWitnessScript() function to
correctly relfect what is being executed.
pull/22428/head
sanket1729 3 years ago
parent 8ab0c77299
commit 007910388b

@ -1807,16 +1807,16 @@ bool GenericTransactionSignatureChecker<T>::CheckSequence(const CScriptNum& nSeq
template class GenericTransactionSignatureChecker<CTransaction>;
template class GenericTransactionSignatureChecker<CMutableTransaction>;
static bool ExecuteWitnessScript(const Span<const valtype>& stack_span, const CScript& scriptPubKey, unsigned int flags, SigVersion sigversion, const BaseSignatureChecker& checker, ScriptExecutionData& execdata, ScriptError* serror)
static bool ExecuteWitnessScript(const Span<const valtype>& stack_span, const CScript& exec_script, unsigned int flags, SigVersion sigversion, const BaseSignatureChecker& checker, ScriptExecutionData& execdata, ScriptError* serror)
{
std::vector<valtype> stack{stack_span.begin(), stack_span.end()};
if (sigversion == SigVersion::TAPSCRIPT) {
// OP_SUCCESSx processing overrides everything, including stack element size limits
CScript::const_iterator pc = scriptPubKey.begin();
while (pc < scriptPubKey.end()) {
CScript::const_iterator pc = exec_script.begin();
while (pc < exec_script.end()) {
opcodetype opcode;
if (!scriptPubKey.GetOp(pc, opcode)) {
if (!exec_script.GetOp(pc, opcode)) {
// Note how this condition would not be reached if an unknown OP_SUCCESSx was found
return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_BAD_OPCODE);
}
@ -1839,7 +1839,7 @@ static bool ExecuteWitnessScript(const Span<const valtype>& stack_span, const CS
}
// Run the script interpreter.
if (!EvalScript(stack, scriptPubKey, flags, checker, sigversion, execdata, serror)) return false;
if (!EvalScript(stack, exec_script, flags, checker, sigversion, execdata, serror)) return false;
// Scripts inside witness implicitly require cleanstack behaviour
if (stack.size() != 1) return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_CLEANSTACK);

Loading…
Cancel
Save