You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
bitcoin/test/functional/interface_usdt_net.py

173 lines
6.6 KiB

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2022 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
""" Tests the net:* tracepoint API interface.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/tracing.md#context-net
"""
import ctypes
from io import BytesIO
# Test will be skipped if we don't have bcc installed
try:
from bcc import BPF, USDT # type: ignore[import]
except ImportError:
pass
from test_framework.messages import msg_version
from test_framework.p2p import P2PInterface
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import assert_equal
# Tor v3 addresses are 62 chars + 6 chars for the port (':12345').
MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH = 68
MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH = 20
MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH = 20
# We won't process messages larger than 150 byte in this test. For reading
# larger messanges see contrib/tracing/log_raw_p2p_msgs.py
MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH = 150
net_tracepoints_program = """
#include <uapi/linux/ptrace.h>
#define MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH {}
#define MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH {}
#define MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH {}
#define MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH {}
""".format(
MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH,
MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH,
MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH,
MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH
) + """
#define MIN(a,b) ({ __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); _a < _b ? _a : _b; })
struct p2p_message
{
u64 peer_id;
char peer_addr[MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH];
char peer_conn_type[MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH];
char msg_type[MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH];
u64 msg_size;
u8 msg[MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH];
};
BPF_PERF_OUTPUT(inbound_messages);
int trace_inbound_message(struct pt_regs *ctx) {
struct p2p_message msg = {};
bpf_usdt_readarg(1, ctx, &msg.peer_id);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(2, ctx, &msg.peer_addr, MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(3, ctx, &msg.peer_conn_type, MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(4, ctx, &msg.msg_type, MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH);
bpf_usdt_readarg(5, ctx, &msg.msg_size);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(6, ctx, &msg.msg, MIN(msg.msg_size, MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH));
inbound_messages.perf_submit(ctx, &msg, sizeof(msg));
return 0;
}
BPF_PERF_OUTPUT(outbound_messages);
int trace_outbound_message(struct pt_regs *ctx) {
struct p2p_message msg = {};
bpf_usdt_readarg(1, ctx, &msg.peer_id);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(2, ctx, &msg.peer_addr, MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(3, ctx, &msg.peer_conn_type, MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(4, ctx, &msg.msg_type, MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH);
bpf_usdt_readarg(5, ctx, &msg.msg_size);
bpf_usdt_readarg_p(6, ctx, &msg.msg, MIN(msg.msg_size, MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH));
outbound_messages.perf_submit(ctx, &msg, sizeof(msg));
return 0;
};
"""
class NetTracepointTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 1
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_platform_not_linux()
self.skip_if_no_bitcoind_tracepoints()
self.skip_if_no_python_bcc()
self.skip_if_no_bpf_permissions()
def run_test(self):
# Tests the net:inbound_message and net:outbound_message tracepoints
# See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/tracing.md#context-net
class P2PMessage(ctypes.Structure):
_fields_ = [
("peer_id", ctypes.c_uint64),
("peer_addr", ctypes.c_char * MAX_PEER_ADDR_LENGTH),
("peer_conn_type", ctypes.c_char * MAX_PEER_CONN_TYPE_LENGTH),
("msg_type", ctypes.c_char * MAX_MSG_TYPE_LENGTH),
("msg_size", ctypes.c_uint64),
("msg", ctypes.c_ubyte * MAX_MSG_DATA_LENGTH),
]
def __repr__(self):
return f"P2PMessage(peer={self.peer_id}, addr={self.peer_addr.decode('utf-8')}, conn_type={self.peer_conn_type.decode('utf-8')}, msg_type={self.msg_type.decode('utf-8')}, msg_size={self.msg_size})"
self.log.info(
"hook into the net:inbound_message and net:outbound_message tracepoints")
ctx = USDT(pid=self.nodes[0].process.pid)
ctx.enable_probe(probe="net:inbound_message",
fn_name="trace_inbound_message")
ctx.enable_probe(probe="net:outbound_message",
fn_name="trace_outbound_message")
bpf = BPF(text=net_tracepoints_program, usdt_contexts=[ctx], debug=0)
EXPECTED_INOUTBOUND_VERSION_MSG = 1
checked_inbound_version_msg = 0
checked_outbound_version_msg = 0
Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
1 year ago
events = []
def check_p2p_message(event, inbound):
nonlocal checked_inbound_version_msg, checked_outbound_version_msg
if event.msg_type.decode("utf-8") == "version":
self.log.info(
f"check_p2p_message(): {'inbound' if inbound else 'outbound'} {event}")
peer = self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()[0]
msg = msg_version()
msg.deserialize(BytesIO(bytes(event.msg[:event.msg_size])))
assert_equal(peer["id"], event.peer_id, peer["id"])
assert_equal(peer["addr"], event.peer_addr.decode("utf-8"))
assert_equal(peer["connection_type"],
event.peer_conn_type.decode("utf-8"))
if inbound:
checked_inbound_version_msg += 1
else:
checked_outbound_version_msg += 1
def handle_inbound(_, data, __):
Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
1 year ago
nonlocal events
event = ctypes.cast(data, ctypes.POINTER(P2PMessage)).contents
Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
1 year ago
events.append((event, True))
def handle_outbound(_, data, __):
event = ctypes.cast(data, ctypes.POINTER(P2PMessage)).contents
Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
1 year ago
events.append((event, False))
bpf["inbound_messages"].open_perf_buffer(handle_inbound)
bpf["outbound_messages"].open_perf_buffer(handle_outbound)
self.log.info("connect a P2P test node to our bitcoind node")
test_node = P2PInterface()
self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(test_node)
bpf.perf_buffer_poll(timeout=200)
self.log.info(
Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
1 year ago
"check receipt and content of in- and outbound version messages")
for event, inbound in events:
check_p2p_message(event, inbound)
assert_equal(EXPECTED_INOUTBOUND_VERSION_MSG,
checked_inbound_version_msg)
assert_equal(EXPECTED_INOUTBOUND_VERSION_MSG,
checked_outbound_version_msg)
Manage exceptions in bcc callback functions Exceptions are not propagated in ctype callback functions used by bcc. This means an AssertionError exception raised by check_equal() to signal a failed assertion is not getting caught and properly logged. Instead, the error is logged to stdout and execution of the handler stops. The current workaround to check whether all check_equal() assertions in a callback succeeded is to increment a success counter after the assertions (which only gets incremented if none exception is raised and stops execution). Then, outside the callback, the success counter can be used to check whether a callback executed successfully. One issue with the described workaround is that when an exception occurs, there is no way of telling which of the check_equal() statements caused the exception; moreover, there is no way of inspecting how the pieces of data that got compared in check_equal() differed (often a crucial clue when debugging what went wrong). Two fixes to this problem come to mind. The first involves having the callback function make event data accessible outside the callback and inspecting the event using check_equal() outside the callback. This solution still requires a counter in the callback to tell whether a callback was actually executed or if instead the call to perf_buffer_poll() timed out. The second fix entails wrapping all relevant check_equal() statements inside callback functions into try-catch blocks and manually logging AssertionErrors. While not as elegant in terms of design, this approach can be more pragmatic for more complex tests (e.g., ones involving multiple events, events of different types, or the order of events). The solution proposed here is to select the most pragmatic fix on a case-by-case basis: Tests in interface_usdt_net.py, interface_usdt_mempool.py and interface_usdt_validation.py have been refactored to use the first approach, while the second approach was chosen for interface_usdt_utxocache.py (partly to provide a reference for the second approach, but mainly because the utxocache tests are the most intricate tests, and refactoring them to use the first approach would negatively impact their readability). Lastly, interface_usdt_coinselection.py was kept unchanged because it does not use check_equal() statements inside callback functions.
1 year ago
bpf.cleanup()
if __name__ == '__main__':
NetTracepointTest().main()